TrnsltLife
Maybe we need a new pronoun for it. 2nd person inanimate. YOU -> YAI?
This week I was experimenting with leaving out "you" pronouns by changing everything to passive/subjunctive and leaving out the subject.
E.g. when referring to something the AI has written or done: The code that was written... Instead of: The code you wrote.
For something I want it to do: May the code be modified to include the following constraints... Instead of: Modify the code to include the following constraints
I don't know if that's really helpful but it's good to be cognizant I'm not really talking to anyone.
But I agree we shouldn't be using robot dogs for this. They should be reserved for tracking down and destroying banned books.
They should both go home to their wives who surely have their cookies ready along with a pair of slippers and a backrub.
Now that women are back out of the workforce, there's enough money for the blue collar worker and the immigrant. I hear the 2050s are gonna be a 1950s paradise but with better technology. Here's hoping.
Far worse and more consequential was the government-urged censorship on any open discussion of COVID, vaccines, origins, etc. during and after the pandemic.
How many people will be hurt because of idiotic AI responses like this?
Just like AI shouldn't counsel someone to end their own life, it also shouldn't counsel people to end their relationships, their careers, and so on.
China probably looks at these people as a good reason why they have to keep going no matter what.
Scientific Evidence Supports Customary and Backup (Conditional) Spanking by Parents: Update of Larzelere and Baumrind (2010) and Fuller (2009) Robert E Larzelere, Jason Fuller
2019, Session at the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts
Abstract This outline provides pincite references for research supporting appropriate disciplinary spanking, in contrast to the predominantly correlational evidence used to oppose all spanking by the APA and AAP. Two major publications in the past year showed that (1) the correlational evidence against customary spanking becomes trivial after adjusting for pre-existing child differences. Moreover, that trivial evidence can be either harmful or beneficial on average, depending upon the statistical method used to adjust for pre-existing differences. (2) The second recent publication shows that the evidence against customary spanking is identical to the apparent effects of most corrective actions when analyzed in the same way (e.g., longitudinal analyses controlling statistically for initial differences in the outcome). This is true whether the corrective actions are by parents (e.g., other disciplinary responses) or professionals (treatments for depression in women). The outline summarizes other meta-analyses ignored in scientific summaries used to oppose all spanking and evidence that back-up spanking and phased-out spanking result in better outcomes compared to never-spanked children.
Elsewhere it is written: "Present yourselves as living sacrifices, holy and acceptable until God, which is your reasonable act of worship."
These are voluntary acts of obedience in the same way that Jesus, though being in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but humbled himself, taking on the form of a servant, and being obedient even to death on a cross. (Philippians 2).
To be a Christian is to take up your cross and follow Christ. Consenting to a lack of consent in how your body is treated hence forward. A martyr's painful death. Or the embrace of your spouse.
Non theistic Buddhism is still considered a religion.
Worldview might be a better term for us to use in understanding people's first amendment rights. And also the idea that there is no neutral worldview. E.g. "secularism" is directly hostile to many religious viewpoints, and to the degree that its proponents use it to oppose religion, secularism becomes a religion/worldview/belief system.
Carriages had drivers and passengers. Those human functions are still present in cars.
Yabba dabba doo!
It's a danger to beware of, that people might start to listen to LLMs like they have the gospel truth on morality and spiritual matters. But they're just an image of a man given breath and speech, without true wisdom. Man took sand and copper and formed the simulation of a mind. If we then bow down to it and obey it, we're fools.