SirLordBoss
Re:Decade-old RAM is making a comeback
on Sunday October 11, 2026 @09:44AM (#50043235)
How so?
Re:Nvidia Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and NeMo Switchyard
on Wednesday August 12, 2026 @06:58AM (#49270464)
What's the sota? The classic vLLM/llama.cpp? LM Studio? Unsloth studio any good?
Re:Muse Code and Muse Spark 1.2
on Thursday August 06, 2026 @03:32PM (#49201265)
I can't understand the psychology of people who think like this.
You really think a throwaway quote when Zuckerberg was a college student applies nowadays?
You really think Meta would risk getting a massive (losing) lawsuit on their hands, in exchange for what? Middling amounts of training data?
Re:Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]
on Monday July 27, 2026 @12:47PM (#49072279)
Why? Absolutely correct, especially considering the position of the person they're referring to
Re:Your Brain Changes Based on What You Did Two Weeks Ago
on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @03:03PM (#41791473)
To be fair, they're not exactly wrong. Worth repeating with N=10,100,... until we get a robust conclusion, but as it is, there's not much to go on in this one
Re:Avante.nvim: Use Your Neovim Like Using Cursor AI IDE
on Monday August 26, 2024 @12:09PM (#41358641)
The lack of an option on Windows makes it harder to justify when alacritty + nvim achieves great speeds as well, with all the customizability and what not.
Can anyone chime in on whether using zed on wsl is viable, or loses all the speed benefits?
Re:You don't know how bad most things are nor precisely how they're bad
on Saturday August 24, 2024 @07:13AM (#41337285)
This is such an all-or-nothing thought. We can aim for "better", or even just "good enough", without aiming for absolute perfection or mediocrity, and things will still keep getting better.
His point is excessively perfectionistic at best, to the point of detriment, and at worst... well, it's pedantic.
Re:You don't know how bad most things are nor precisely how they're bad
on Friday August 23, 2024 @02:24PM (#41331601)
To follow this analogy, isn't it possible then for someone to study precisely what the difference is, and become an expert, thus bringing us back into the level of expertise we were at at the start of the analogy?
Surely the experts didn't all learn from each other; who was the first expert? That expert surely learned in some other way, so the only thing lost at the start of the analogy is the time required for someone interested to (re)achieve mastery.