News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Seylerius

This memory management looks pretty shiny, but is there any way to get down to manual allocation as well?
Certainly allow it, but provide a sane default, too. If you don't, people wiill be more likely to do something stupid than they would be otherwise.
It seems like what3words is precisely as helpful as standard coordinates, with the exception that coordinates don't depend on a proprietary company.
This is an awesome idea. What I'd really like to know, however, is if any of the existing loan options will accept this as schooling in order to loan a student money for living expenses. Some students already have a family, and thus they cannot crash at a flophouse.
Re:Possible routes for distributed anti-abuse systems on Tuesday April 04, 2017 @09:20PM (#14038875)
Constraint programming is an interesting model to discuss here. I've been looking into machine-generated constraints, and there's a lot of potential for transparency when you get into constraint-producing functions that also produce labels, and then go further up the abstraction ladder from there. Structured right, you can produce dynamic labeled matchers, especially if you build a UI tool for marking particular hateful elements of hate speech.
This is a fascinating project. The hardest part of writing crypto software will always be avoiding the little mistakes, and every time we can bottle the understanding needed to detect some of them, we free cognitive labor for finding others. This is a necessary part of the future of crypto development. I tip my hat to the Wycheproof team!
Re:I'm giving up on PGP on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @09:29PM (#13120024)
The device could be something like a modified USB condom, but with more processing power. It would have to have all drivers locked unless a sensor verified that nothing was plugged into the suspicious end, and use a fundamentally limited set of drivers. On connection, it looks for any filesystems on the suspicious device, mounts them, and offers them up by proxy as filesystems to the host machine. Nice idea.
Re:A tool to make Windows builds reproducible on Tuesday December 06, 2016 @01:48AM (#13112718)
On the one hand, my knee-jerk reaction to this involves a meaningful amount of Windows-hate. In short: there is a tight limit to the amount of trust I can give to any build on a platform that I can't build.

On the other hand, reproducible builds are /important/. The better we can trust our tools and verify that they're exactly what we think they are, the less we need to worry about the security of our tools, and the more we can get on with /using them/.

In the end, despite enabling the continued use of a deeply proprietary and anti-freedom platform, this is a good thing.

Re:Intel Security True Key on Sunday December 04, 2016 @05:11PM (#13102048)
Yet another reason why this is a horrible idea.
Re:Intel Security True Key on Sunday December 04, 2016 @03:33PM (#13101652)
This is an adorably bad idea:

+ As fdik said above, you can't change your fingerprint or face easily, and it's always public

+ Face recognition and fingerprint scanning are not robust against spoofing — there are known ways to circumvent both

+ You can be compelled to authenticate a biometric without a warrant

Don't use biometrics as a password; use them as a username.

If "quarter" is defined as "3 months", we're officially just on the outside of a quarter since the last update — 3 months and 5 days, to be precise.