ScottHanson
A question.
Did Roarke have the moral or legal rights to destroy the development after the owners changed the design?
Ayn Rand says no; Gladwell says yes.
Hence the blogger's comment:
"Atlas Shrugged is a similar story. In it a group of scientists and tycoons decide in equally petulant fashion that they will "simply take their ball and go home", when society refuses to capitulate to their capricious demands. So what happens? Well, according to Ayn Rand everything in the world grinds to a halt. In her bizarre world view, no replacements are available amongst the rest of humanity to rise up to the occasion and take over from the cry-babies who have gone home in a snit."
Yes, in real life others would have stepped up to the plate.
The article has value in that it's stirred up an examination of Positivism. Too many college kids get all caught up in this nonsense. Then the join the Republican Party as a result.
The post contributes to an important societal debate over whether or not the successful owe anything back to society, such as taxes.
Obviously it's stimulated a lot of heat.