QDwQ1

Personally I would like a car that simply does not generate any "data" in the first place.

"Ubuntu" is an ancient African word meaning "I can't configure Debian."

> actually if you don't support importing hundreds of thousands of workers to depress wages, you're a racist

ok mr CIA

EU politicians should grow some balls and force their companies to ignore US sanctions in cases like these

may as well just cut to the chase and give everyone a fully automated heroin IV. that would maximize total happiness, after all

See also: Russia, 1917

I have some bad news for you about how our society actually functions...

> "world-class" security team

> decided to sandbox models by restricting them to GET requests

lol, lmao even

oh they won't be doing much meditating in _my_ labor camps, don't worry about that

All I want in life is to see these companies seized by the government, their assets destroyed (preferably using one of those big car crusher thingies), and their executives and boards of directors imprisoned in labor camps in the Alaskan wilderness.

ideally British banks would have their infrastructure located in Britain and therefore would not rely on undersea cables

the line WILL go up

Yes, the US was a full-blown communist nation until 2015, when Congress repealed the long-standing ban on exports of crude oil.

> To protect yourself from an upstream resolver using DNSSEC, you need to be doing something akin to a full recursive lookup yourself. This is a flaw in the DNSSEC design and a reason why DoH took off instead.

What? I don't see how you can call that a flaw in DNSSEC when DoH is no better in this regard; it doesn't even attempt to protect against a malicious recursive resolver. The only way to do that is to validate DNSSEC on the client.

god I hope so. AI destroying the Internet would be the best possible outcome for humanity