Papier345
Thats where that one is coming from.
Could go either way. Lets try nothing otherwise we might create a sustainable environment with healthy air, energy and more animals for nothing.
Don't state like its the norm now not to believe well known old and trusty news papers.
My basic assumption is, that they are not lying but they can also make mistakes.
Do you think its okay to hunt down a species like a blue whale from 400k to 10-30k and say 'yeah thats okay'?
There are plenty of other examples.
And do you assume they grow back because of no intervention or continuous intervention? I would say its about continues intervention.
Continues -> reminding people how shitty it is and that we can't accept the current state which you would say is 'pretty OK'.
And don't get me wrong: Why would you even try to counter argue about something like whale rescue? Do you have the feeling that we as a society are spending too much money on rescuing and saving species versus i don't know cars?
Lets give them more money, lets create jobs which are actually here to help our planet and lets do something useful once instead of writing just another backend.