News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Naklin

> We spent a week of engineers time (and that is the worst case estimate) on the initial migration, spread across SRE, platform, and database owners.

I’m sorry but I don’t believe this for one second.

And unfortunately that makes me distrust the entirety of the article.

Re:The New Calculus of AI-Based Coding on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @04:22AM (#45730322)
Without disclosing said metrics or any data...

This is really something striking to me about all these AI productivity claims. They never provide the methodology and data.

Re:Bezos says AI is in an industrial bubble on Saturday October 04, 2025 @04:07AM (#45471600)
Interesting. Do you have any sources for this 60/40 split? And while I agree that the infrastructure has a long shelf life, it seems to me like an AI bubble burst would greatly depreciate the value of this infrastructure as the demand for it plummets, no?
I’m all for better accounting practices and better tracking of government spending as well as eliminating waste. Absolutely.

But pretending that Musk and co are doing an audit by accessing treasury transaction records and that it will help with government waste in any way is laughable.

Again, literally no one would be able to make any kind of credible department spending audit out of the bank records of a mid-sized company.

This is the US government’s treasury we’re talking about here! This is several orders of magnitude bigger and more complicated!

Not to mention an audit would not require any write access.

That’s the same thing though.

You think the treasury doesn’t have a metric ton of procedures, and laws, on data management, integrity, access, backup and retention?

Breaking these protocols by giving unfettered write access to this data to ridiculously inexperienced and ignorant goons exponentially increases the risk of data tampering and corruption…

It makes any kind of audit LESS likely to be accurate.

But they’re very obviously not doing any kind of credible audit. As mentioned, that’s literally impossible and nonsensical to do this way.

Every report on this shows the data has been made much LESS secure now.
> Doing an audit starting with the treasury department seems like the right first step.

That's complete nonsense.

Imagine you're trying to track spending of departments at a massive company. You wouldn't start by looking at a giant list of wire transfers from/to the company's bank accounts and work your way backwards to find what each payment refers to would you?

That would make no sense. Not only would it be practically impossible to do but plenty of resources might be shared between departments and lumped into single payments to a single company for many services, some payments or reimbursements might span several transfers, some things might be paid upfront, other bills may be only due later etc...

That would be a ridiculously bad way to go about it. And then imagine someone starts canceling random wire transfers that they think "look suspicious" lol.

I mean, with the extreme politicization of DOJ and FBI already under way by Trump and his cronies, and the dismantling of safeguards like inspector generals there's literally no chance that these people get indicted or even investigated under this administration.

> is he going to pardon everyone who has a hand in this?

How can anyone have any doubts after the jan 6 pardons?

Re:France's oldest treasure hunt has been solved on Thursday October 03, 2024 @09:59AM (#41730881)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Trail_of_the_Golden_Owl...

There are more details on the french wikipedia article but basically Michel Becker did everything he could to make money out of the success of the treasure hunt, doing things that were either unethical or deemed contrary to the true creator's original intent. This included taking possession of the solution which wasn't meant for him to get, trying to sell the prize for himself and releasing new clues to renew interest in the hunt which he was still profiting from in different ways.