MrStonedOne
The concern is that google basically funds firefox, and can choose to revoke that funding at the most inconvenient time for mozilla, risking bankruptcy. Companies ebb and flow on cash flow, and a unexpected drop at the exact wrong moment can cripple even the most well funded ones.
Or just threaten to do so to exert pressure.
Percentage of Participants Working Full-time, Enrollment and 6-month Follow-up:[1]
Group A (1000usd/m): 18% -> 25%
Group B (6500usd one time + 500usd/m): 21% -> 35%
Group C (50usd/m): 22% -> 22%
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37836296
[1]: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gqtOfZG2sSanWgUdzn-lx-pwSXZ... page 22 (pdf page 23) figure 9
And as the digital world increasingly invades and influences our realities and experiences the importance of not only serving the common denominator gets more important, not less.
engagement driving bullshit could very easy become banned under ADA if the right public servant gave it enough thought.
This is like if the names of the functions in the c++ STL (and their argument/return types) was released under gpl, and they came out and "updated" their license to be basically cc-by-sa-nc but worse and also claimed it retroactively applied to the license. It could technically have repercussions to other languages that mirrored the style.
Now the fun question! how much of what was covered by the OGL was actually copyrightable?
Ideas and facts are not copyrightable, arrangement of ideas and facts can be copyrightable with a higher bar of 'creativity', but the barrer to change before it becomes a new 'arrangement' and not covered is also lower.
His ""violations"" were all mistakes on the cities part or auditors trying to pigeonhole things into regulations they don't apply to.
He followed the regulations, and that wasn't even good enough.
You say he "used the dense, relatively wealthy New York ecosystem," to launch a business, but from their prospective i bet they feel they started a company in their hometown and then their hometown spat in their face in an attempt to get more money.
You are confusing signed off by the court with issued by the court.
Powerline tends to be sorta unreliable and only runs at like 5-15% of the rated max speed, but if you had buffering at the camera to ensure all frames made it to the otherside, you could work around that.
Those fucking suck, and some of us use our laptops on our laps, with ethernet connected. Those expanding jacks basically only work while it is on a desk because if the cable bends downwards even a tiny bit it just comes out.
So, where i get stuck, is that you can't actually make this statement about any individual black woman or white man.
The one common theme across all of social justice is that stereotyping is bad. Erasing individuality and forcing people to live in the shadow of their stereotypes is bad.
Yet its apparently allowed here? Because it mostly benefits minorities?
This is the unspoken line the separates identity politics and equality. A focus on minorities vs a focus on ending discrimination and stereotyping, which under equality would include AA.
When (most) people say they are against "woke" culture or "sjws" they generally mean they are against the identity politics flavor of ""equality"". Because identity politics is just a racist sexist dog whistle for discrimination against majorities.
Verifiably open source packages are a net positive to security because it ensures the code running is the same code that has the public's eye on it.
People keep forgetting this, because they spend most their time thinking about security in the terms of a enterprise system, but for a personal usecase, an app extracting data to their servers that i was not expecting is a info leak security breach.
Its just that acknowledging that fact requires treating most operating systems (ubuntu, (but not debian) android, and ios included) as malware and this is a uncomfortable position.
If it's acceptable to send the picture as a file upload over http then i see no reason why it wouldn't be acceptable to send a webcam captured picture.
Why do you think it should or would?
Every program that has any need for optimization will quickly turn into a death by a thousand cuts.
There is no right or wrong level of premature optimization, it all comes down to how much time it takes to code it to be more performant. if it takes a tiny amount of time, do so, even if you get little gains. if it takes twice as long to make it more performant, only do so if necessary or results in more than 50% gains.
This is why police fired into a stolen minivan that had a unrelated child and a shoplifting/carjacking suspect in it, killing both. Protecting the child took a back seat to punishing the prep.
Therefore CP laws very quickly stopped being about protecting the children and more about punishing the pedophiles.
Vindictiveness and spite are the unspoken role models of the US justice system.
Nudity in kids is seen as obscene purely because a pedophile could find it arousing. We are preemptively sexualing children in order to prevent their sexualiztion.
A child was once forced to masturbate in front of a camera by COURT ORDER. Police held them down. All because the child was a victim of child pornography and the court wanted a "comparison image" in a similar arousal state to prove it was a image of that child.
Once again, a child was victimized by the justice system, in order to punish a perp.
Never make the mistake of thinking anybody in the justice system gives a rats ass about protecting anyone.
we already get multiple millions of page hits a months for this happened.
This server had 8 cores but 5 of them were reserved for the 10tb a month in bandwidth game servers running on the same machine.
If you needed 1,000 physical computers to run your webapp, you fucked up somewhere along the line.
Here's how that breaks down:
The servers (sorry, i mean compute) cost the same (before bandwidth, more on that at the bottom) to host one game server as we pay (amortized) per game server to host 5 game servers on a rented dedicated server. ($175/month for the rented server with 64gb of ram and a 10gbit uplink)
They run twice as slow because high core count slow clock speed servers aren't all they are cracked up to be, and our game engine is single threaded, but even if it wasn't, there is an overhead to multithreading things which combined with most high core count servers also having slow clock speed, rarely squares out to an actual increase in real world performance.
You can get the high clock speed units, they are twice to three times as expensive. And still run 20% slower over windows vms on rented bare metal because the sad fact is enterprise cpus by either intel or amd have slower clock speeds and single threaded performance then their gaming cpu counterparts, and getting gaming cpus for rented servers is piss easy, but next to impossible for cloud servers.
Each game server uses 2tb of bandwidth to host 70 player high pops. This works with 5 servers on 1 machine because our hosting provider gives us 15tb of bandwidth included in the price of the server.
Well now the cloud bill just got a new 0. 10 to 30x more expensive once you remember to price in bandwidth isn't looking too great.
"but it would make it cheaper for small downstreams to start out" until another youtuber mentions our tiny game, and every game server is hitting the 120 hard pop cap, and a bunch of downstreams get a surprise 4 digit bill for what would normally run 2 digits.
The take away from this being that even adding in docker or k8s deployment support to the game server is seen as creating the risk some kid bankrupts themselves trying to host a game server of their favorite game off their mcdonalds paycheck, and we tell such tech "pros" to sod off with their trendy money wasters.
That sounds like an argument against self driving cars.
if you have enough karma, you can vouch for banned user's comments by clicking the vouch button, it only shows on the direct page for the comment, you get by clicking the date of the comment.
I know all of this because I am banned.
This, in my view, is the problem with FIDO.
They shouldn't be able to make that choice.
Blockchains refer to any time you use a chain of hashes to prove a block of data and any data that came before it, has not been mutated.
The time keeper service that takes out classified ads in the new york times with hash blocks for the documents they timestamped to prove they were timestamped before a certain date, is a blockchain, because they include the previous day's hash.
Git, is a blockchain.
It's just hashes all the way down.
The random entropy driver in linux, is technically a blockchain, with how it works.