MeNotMe
MeNotMe on Hacker News
1. It's much easier to compromise a DB into a dump with injection, insufficient access control etc. than dump the db, find out it's encrypted, then hack the app servers and find a key somewhere in the binary.
2. You can use key distribution schemes to the app servers.
3. If you need to 'live' search in personal data you're doing it wrong. You can move search to a fulltext engine for the stuff you really need, which is more difficult to dump and reassemble. E.g. if you search for city, you only have primary keys and cities in one system.
4. You should also not keep profiles, personal data and other data on one server. Compromising one of the access paths will compromise all your data.
Two points:
1. Encrypt all database data, decrypt in application.
2. If you only do perimeter defense, you're doing it wrong.
1. I've replaced it with a Miele and a Siemens (needed two)
2. The both clean better, I find less dirt in carpets and e.g. in corners than with the Dyson.
3. Personal subjective opinion: Having a bag is cleaner for me.
Not to make this a point, as my initial "many" is weak on facts, but your example makes it "one person think", not many.
I was such a huge Dyson fan, bought a cleaner a decade ago, read his books.
Had the suspicion the cleaner was crap. Lots of reviews said the same. But I convinced myself I and the others were wrong, Dyson is a genius.
Some years ago I finally admitted it was expensive crap and got something else.
Not sure how your example adds something to "many think".
This opens you up for disruption, if others with less expertise can write the same secure code using e.g. Rust (I have no clue about Rust)
Oh contraire, fitness is a 'success' because many think they should do more but don't have the willpower and then buy this magic device to overcome their lack of will.
This leads to hardware sales and non-usage.
Which makes it really hard for others to work on such a plattform.
It's such a bad idea. Germany needed to be pressured into the Euro by Mitterand in exchange for Germanys unification. France didn't want a unified Germany with an independent currency.