Manfrednotfunny
Manfrednotfunny on Hacker News
The whole industry is now pushing through memory.
In 5 years you have either some type of explosion which willjust make all the hardware from today affordable or you have such an AI explosion, that the today hardware is written off and not efficient enough anymore that you can buy it for cheap.
In parallel, its clear that we need more memory.
In parallel models in hardware will become a thing on mass market.
In parallel everything gets more efficient. The 30B parameter model will be for sure more intelligent in 5 years than it is today.
China also puts pressure on rich chinese flaunting their riches.
They have a common prosperity initiative.
I sleep bad -> buy watch -> watch tells me I sleep bad -> win/win?
In the gym, i use the timer. But is it worth it to carry a watch all the time, keep it charged etc. for a timer? I'm considering buying a timer for the gym.
We just do'nt need a lot of tech in reality.
This alone will lead to being able to run a fable class claude model 24/7 and potentially running something like this in parallel multiply times over.
Elon Musk, as the richest person on the planet, bought himself a propaganda platform he controls and started to finger around in democracy.
Its a lot more than 'just' CSAM.
Elon Musk wasn't happy that his own chatbot was to left, so they 'adjusted' grok so often until it became mechahitler.
Trump doesn't care.
I don't think this will be banned in the USA
Mechahitler? the lawsuite for CSAM in europe?
Learn about were you work and whom you work for...
Apparently you are unable to coprehend that other peole have values.
They already hire and pay people with research titles for creating and solving problems in their fields.
And a lot of labs say that RL can help everywere and has plenty of way to go.
You can also run massive amount of LLMs in parallel.
There might be a limit to a normal LLM but not to theo everall system.
So no.
All this massive massive massive compute can be used for different types of machine learning. Nuclear Fusion physics simulation, neural networks for every other use case etc.
I'm not sure if we needed AI/ML for breaking the memory wall.
But yeah we will see how the society will respond to more and more and more automatisation.
ML/AI/Robotics is for sure the next automatisation revolution.
But the current state of AI is a very good indicator were it is going. Even if we don't achieve AGI, do you think AI in its current form will not be better in 5 or 10 years and we will have this solved a lot more/better than today?
Even with AI, you still need to design the software, test it, try it out, deploy it and scale it. An proper agentic platform still needs time to be build.
And the models need to be a little bit better and for that you want human feedback/reinforcement learning
LLM was invented and its just clear that this is something someone needs to build.
Why?
Because it makes just sense. You don't want an agent running on a laptop you close. You want to keep context small, you want to split up work / parallize it etc.
I'm now waiting for a while until the open source agent platform emerges and im borderline motivated to build something but i'm not doing it. He did, which is not a crime.
If maintenance and security is fully automated and for small changes or a small feature you will only dump some spec document into your agent platform, for sure.
Woman have a clear disavantage due to all the medical tests and medicine was/is still primarly made and tested for men physics.
The differentiation, experimentation etc. comes after.
The big difference probably will be the compute use, the big players will introduce A2A stuff sooner than later, than you don't need to login into any services per webui.
I think we will also see more streamlined things, like verified actions / signed actions, etc.
The current istuation could be seen as just the next real frontier technology of the human race.
the problem is capitalism. Instead of leverigng it as a tool, we talk about job loss and restructuring etc. which affects real humans.
In a non capitalistic system, it might just not affect real humans negativly at all only positive
Wealth is also only relevant in a capitalistic system, which we invented. It could easily be that all other species never created capitalism and are therefore waiting for us somewere which we will not reach because we are stuck on 'wealth'.
And if we are stuck in a local minimum, it might seem that GPT-2 broke us out of there.
Could you elaborate?
But at least with your email, you had to trust only one company, as shitty as it is.
Separation of concerns was also easy.
Now with OpenRouter, you just might by accident, send your whole context to just everyone because OpenRouter just routes to different models and you might just switch around between some free model, the good one etc. And it is always the whole context.
MoE will be faster because it will read less memory for sure, you still have to have it though.
Its not just that you send a sentence to an API endpoint, you always send EVERYTHING to that agent as a context.
You want to analyse your spending history? You now send everything to someone.
Either no one cares but understands this implication on how easy it is to really capture you or no one really things about it.
But i'm a lot more diligent on what I send. I disabled the gemini activity feature for example because google started telling me that my stuff could be reviwed by humans.