Kelevra

Does anyone still type "www" ... ever?

I think Firefox just tries several common TLDs when it can't resolve a name, i.e., when you type "ebay", it tries "ebay.com", "ebay.org", "ebay.net", etc. No integration with Google required.

That's why "ebay" gets you to "ebay.com" and "slashdot" gets you to "slashdot.org", but "del.icio" doesn't go to "del.icio.us", and "last" doesn't go to "last.fm" even though those are the #1 Google results for "del.icio" and "last".

Your "solution" to the problem of a community-driven website is to stop making it a community-driven website and call in the administrators? Isn't that pretty much giving up?

Wow. Good for her and all that, but I think skipping out on school is a mistake, whatever she's earning.

"Elaborate?" His notion is, if anything, radical in its simplicity.

Websites, advertisements, et al. do not exist in a vacuum. If websites "sell despite being ugly" then the whole design business is a scam, and at the end of the day you've got a much more complex situation to explain. What does Occam's razor tell you about that?

The point he's making is that design sends a message. Certain types of "bad" design included. And that certain types of "bad" design send a message that may actually appeal to some users. Is that really so elaborate, so confused?

Here, look how many ads there were just a few days ago:

http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/5483/boingboingoldschooll...

"All the ads?" The ad count is way, way down. Where they used to have a dozen mini-banners, they've now got one big square box.

He quite explicitly says that ugliness (quite apart from simplicity) actually has some advantages, like earning the trust of a certain class of users.

It's fine to disagree, but to suggest that he's "confused" when he's stated that so clearly is kind of condescending.

I think he may be right, and I think the "ugly == trustworthy" idea is also lent credence by the hideous ads in small newspapers, in "Coupon Clipper" type mass-mailings, ugly signs for small local businesses, etc.

It sounds like the aluminum is consumed. Aluminum is plentiful stuff, but energetically speaking, it's very costly to refine. I sure hope this goes somewhere, but I'm not holding my breath, all the same.