Kalavala93

This. ^ And as a piggyback what makes OpenAI five radically different from when they were trounced last year? They scaled up the computing and trained more hours. Butdid anything change? People are still saying it was its micro not it's long term strategy that won the day. Furthermore people who know OG are suspicious that they threw the match because they said "that's not how they play, they made to many amateur mistakes". I'm highly suspicious about OpenAI especially with how they handled GPT-2. Talking to journalist before releasing anything else. Propaganda is definitely what it sounds like.

Better question is what has radically changed with the AI besides more training?

Highly unlikely.

Also it micros like it did back then. Honestly no can seem to articulate what the radical difference is between this AI five and then one from last July. It microed like a God. And had zero long term strategy. Some people who know OG said that even they played different. Which lead people to think OG threw the match in favor of OpenAI for an advertising stunt.

> Exactly. When it comes to generating a large volume of apparently-good sentences, non-AI (or classical) approaches are still better than good.

Can you cite your source? I find this hard to believe.