Inward

You are correct, and anyone that couldn’t come to that conclusion needs to stop overthinking the problem it is pretty basic 101 intro to logic type question.

Not sure why so many people got it wrong maybe ESL is at play here

{{ Spoiler }}

If you didn’t select A, then the test is great for weeding out less intelligent people; which means it’s a good test if that is the objective.

Flagged why? How does this break any rules?

Progressive != good Using buzz words like conservative / progressive is just lazy. This isn’t Twitter/x

This is not AI.

Can we filter posts that erroneously uses the topic AI?

This is NOT an intelligent assiant. I’ve worked with intelligent assistants and this is not even close.

This a statical model prone to error. It’s just frustrating to see AI as continuous, click-bait on a forum that’s advocating intelligent discourse.

Further, we are so far from AI that using the term is not only dishonest, but click bait like.

“I used a LLM to help me do XYZ” - marketing

Hmm go to North Korea and let me know about their drug use and violent crime; internet arm chair comments like these just show how out of touch most people on HN are

Very young courtry but most successful in the last 200 years What do you mean by young? Roman Empire young? Relative terms like young/old when applied to a country that’s a melting of all others let’s me believe you’re not an American or have studied American history in depth.

Stay strapped. Sorry to be harsh, but it’s not policies that keep you and yours safe. You need to protect you and yours and government policies aren’t going to protect you from hard drug users. Sorry you had a terrible experience but since ancient times people have weapons to defend against any enemy.

Yes, that was obvious as soon as I saw it wasn’t live I clicked off. You can train any LLM to perform a certain task(s) well and google engineers are not that dense. This was obvious marketing PR as open AI has completely made google basically obsolete with 90% of my queries can be answered without wading through LLM generated text for a simple answer.

Ridiculous article. Gossip and no way a multi-billion dollar company came to its knees due to pretty pronouns. Remove this gossip it has no place here. Better suited for a gossip site.

The writing style, especially the introduction anecdote is so off putting I could barely stomach the article.

However , I agree with the sentiment of most readers that the problem with dating apps seems to be the quantity / quality problem——without being able to accurately portray quality on most of these platforms.