Hehohei

The issue is, that we talk about a potential placebo/nocebo effect, which means you need to make sure to get rid of all ambigiousities.

And tbh buying / using a device made by a Anti EMF Page/Company who sells EMF protection is everything but trustworthy.

You know bias, fake shops, gold audio cables, crystals etc.

Now: Have you done a proper blind test? What was your experiment setup? How often did you repeat it? And what does it mean

"If such individuals exist, they represent a small minority and have not been identified yet." -> You should talk to them then.

A good blind study would be a EMF isolated room (shielded mesh, etc), a assistant you don't see (no visual or accustic cue at all) and a procedure you can repeat.

You go out, the assitant sets up the experiment (which is recorded, somehow EMF free), either activates an active EMF (perhaps constant file transfer, radio antenna etc.), the person leaves the room (the source is hidden), you enter, you wait x minutes (probably more than one), you either say yes or no and leave.

If you are clearly above random and you can show this result, you would be a good candidate for proper research.

Your assumption that you proof your EMF sensibility by recording the messurement after is way to unprecise. You might hold your EMF device wrong, ignore values, might have some visual or accustic cues etc.

What device do you use to messure EMF? What range? 5G has a broad spectrum, your sector antennas might send while you messure because someone is doing something close by etc.

Can you elaborate how your experiment was setup?

After all, while you do post studies which clarify details of your theory, you do not counter the 48 studies linked in the wikipedia article.

Wikipedia has all of its sources at the bottom of the article itself.

If you could actually proof your claim, people would write an article about you.

There have been plenty of studies for a long time regarding this and a practical 'study' going on for now a long time across the globe with billions of people.

What is your specific worry? getting cancer?

The paper you reference states the same: "Hence, VR headsets and mobile phones are safe."

And yes light is the same thing as anthropomorphically generated electromagnetic radiation, depending on what radiation you talk about. like the light coming from the display. If you mean the specific wireless connection, than no.

At least pls tell me that you don't have quarz cyrstals around you for protection. But if you would take this serious, you do not use wifi? You do life in a metal mesh?

I don't think people bought those just for playing around with it.

They upgraded or started using those generic machines for generic things.

You can't just buy this and use it as a replacement.

What type of 'electromagnetic radiation' is now specially new to this device?

And what health risks are you aware of, i'm not?

You do know, that light is the same thing right? And you do know that even without a headset you do have radio waves and wifi around you constantly?

Why do people wear makeup?

Are you asking me personally? Or do you question the statement overall?

I do live in a society were we evaluate people by looks to a certain degree.

I also don't like it when i don't see my environment.

Why would everything be 2D?

It has two displays, one per eye, it should be able to show real 3D even with a broken focus/unnatural focus

I will not sit in a office, were other people can see me, wearing snow goggles.

As expensive as they are, as stylish as they are.

Look, if i would have 3k to throw around, i would also try it out.

I don't and don't think its reasonable at all.

I do own a htc vice pro + wireless extention from intel + valve controllers, i like that, i do not use it often enough to even justifiy that setup but its 2k and i bought the wireless and the valve controllers one after the other.

I just read the release section of wikipedia and it doesn't sound like it took long for the iPhone to 'catch on'.

"As of Q4 2007, strong iPhone sales put Apple no. 2 in U.S. smartphone vendors, behind Research In Motion and ahead of all Windows Mobile vendors.[50]"

Im also pretty sure that, why its interesting, the benefit is still less than runing your outfit (literally) and this alone will be a deal breaker for A LOT of people.

Despite the price: A lot of corporate phones are top seller phones. I don't get budget from my company to buy this one AND any other deivce and you need both, a laptop and that device as you will not use it 8h a day