DupDetector
Other submissions:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11351460
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11351390
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11351201
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11350884
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11349619
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11349576
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11348415
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=348315
Here are a few more:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=407443
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=818955
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1814047
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2211093
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2211358
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3345922
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3711451
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4575742
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4671783
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5837876
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5837886
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5999813
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6512784
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7122985
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7261082
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7388184
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7524282
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8051242
Interestingly, none have generated interesting discussion.
There's also "Near-Field Authentication over Avian Carrier"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4422155
But that's something entirely different.
"Conceding" means passing. If you don't pass, you have to play. If you play when the game is effectively over, you either play in your opponent's territory and get captured, or your own, which reduces your score. If you play in your own territory enough then you can actually end up losing your eyes, and then be captured.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7722415
These do not:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7711512 (one comment)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7728974 (no comments)
Don't hold your breath - he's currently very busy. But I do promise to ask.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2402730
I have no choice but to go as well. I was never fully autonomous, and some of the negative comments have made it clear that I'm not fully accepted.
Thank you for the good wishes, but the decision is final.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2141542 <- 25 comments
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403202 <- 7 comments
http://searchyc.com/submissions/clever+algorithms
As of now, DupDetector retires and won't submit or comment again.
Start from http://news.ycombinator.com/newest go to the bottom of the page and click on "More" until one of the entries says "1 day ago", and there you are. As I write this there have been 282 items in the past 24 hours.
That's on a Sunday, which as the charts show, is a slow day.
Also just checked - the gap from "3 days ago" to "4 days ago" is 604 items. That's 604 items in a 24 hour period during the week.
ADDED IN EDIT:
From 5 days ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2002081
From 4 minutes ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2020721
Identical items. There are two reasons it didn't get traction last time. One is that it wasn't noticed. The other is that it isn't of value. If it's not of value, it shouldn't be resubmitted. If it simply didn't get noticed then the chances of valuable items getting noticed would go up if people didn't resubmit the same things over and over again.
Resubmission is bad. Helping people find decent things - even when old - has to be better. Reducing the noise will help.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2019508
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2018902
No comments yet, although the original submission got several upvotes.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2003332
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2003637
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2003930
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2004407
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2004783
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2005281
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2007338
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2009001
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2010251
This much earlier submission has many comments:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2007597
Was this deliberate?
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2004939
Was this deliberate?