Drexl

Yea it's rather ambiguous. I responded based on checking.

I think the lesson here is that it is subjective and the ability to use multiple such tools together would be best.

Some things I've noticed:

* Aspect ratio is ignored causing many images to be cropped.

* Some gifs go on so long that the screen blanks on mobile devices. Where do I tap to keep the screen alive?

* Social network sharing links?

* A feature to star gifs as I go along and then share them all at once to <insert network here> or save them would be nice.

I believe the point is that he didn't spam people. He asked a friend to introduce him to one of their friends. I think that's called networking. Your terms are confused.

I'd wager less than 10.

This is where the Omni or a product like it in the future comes into play.

The humor isn't beyond me, but this will never happen. Blizzard is too big to be on Steam. They have no reason to profit share with anyone.

Language evolves. You'll just have to learn to deal with it. Colloquialisms eventually become dictionary definitions in large part due to the influence and reach of the internet. This is the reality of things.

Sure, but teaching people to install, or even feel comfortable installing, such things can be a challenge sometimes. :-/

For a website who's shtick it is to remove the top 1M results from it's index the designer thinks having the default option remove nothing is a good idea apparently. Also, I don't think it actually works unless www.adamwest.com is not in the top one million results for "Adam West"

https://millionshort.com/search.php?q=Adam+West&remove=1000k

Am I the only one that noticed the article that AOL declined to comment on is by a company they own?... I find that rather humorous. AOL owns TechCrunch according to TechCrunch themselves.

It's less than 19, but perhaps the coolest card wallet on the market. Their kickstarter was a HUGE success. Maybe get two of them?

http://www.ridgewallet.com/ http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/124039987/the-bridge-fro...

Couldn't agree more. Apple "won" because 20+M people were to lazy to find a better application or didn't know how and just kept what they were given. For the majority of iOS users that's how it works. You use what you are given and deal with it.

Most likely not. Until evidence is presented that proves otherwise it would be smart to assume it isn't private either. Doing it yourself with a Seed Box is the secure(r) way. I echo the "cool" sentiment though.