DetectDefect

Simply ask to quantify the cost of shaping those materials into machinery, respective to other means of energy production. You will be met with hostility and scorn, accused of all sorts of improprieties, and ejected from the tribe, without ever receiving a data-supported answer.

> In fact we did and we have an electric car, replaced our gas cooking top by induction, and our gas-based heating by a heat pump. Last time I boarded an airplane was in 2019 I think.

Fantastic virtue signaling. Of course totally devoid of any mention about the individuals picking raw materials for those electric car components though, since they're not "our" children.

Not really. People are angry because it is likely their first time hearing a contrarian narrative about solar energy, which likely challenges their own sunk-cost fallacy as solar panel owners.

> I got solar panels installed two years ago

> I've washed them once.

> I'm still getting great production.

Thank you for reiterating my point.

> I haven’t touched ours, they are clean and have been going fine with zero maintenance, though admittedly it’s only been a year.

> Where are you getting this maintenance schedule from?

The solar panel owner does not know the required maintenance they are now permanently responsible for. Ibid, your honor.

The only thing strange is trolling comment history instead of rebutting the argument made on its own merit.

The misplaced aggression and confusion is actually hilarious. We have reached a religion-level fervor by daring to question the economics of energy.

Oh, okay. Does a warranty cover sweeping snow off your panels and washing them many times throughout the years? I guess if one does not value time, then solar panels could be considered "free" - but this is a bizarre sacrifice.

Missing from your calculus is the cost of creating, cleaning, maintaining and eventually replacing the hardware. None of that is "free" - it is merely externalized to a vulnerable population or to your future self.

Because real work takes time and effort, and there is no real incentive for it here.

Closed-source propriety systems certainly have this effect (subjugation), but this is not the Free technology I am talking about.

Why is that strange? Technology's proliferation decentralizes political power nexuses, making it a near-existential threat to tyrants^Wgovernments everywhere.

Care to name any examples?

Volunteer at a local animal sanctuary to spend time with non-human individuals. It is refreshing, meaningful and also fulfilling.

Are you certain inflating the money supply with trillions of dollars by prior administrations did not have an effect?

I'm not pulling my pants down (enable javascript to have my browser identified) and wiggling anything, virtually or otherwise.

An "armed insurrection" is not required to deter a state's monopoly on violence - even the mere decentralization of arms across the populace objectively accomplishes this impressive feat.

No, the message is stating that because I don't allow Javascript to fingerprint and commodify my browser. The euphemized nonsense about malware is just an insult to reason at this point.

> If malicious or scraping traffic is coming from your IP, it's not victim blaming

But it is not; my IP is a residential address paid for with a credit card associated to a human who visits like 6 websites.

This thread is about effectiveness, not tangibility (which ironically proves my point).

Norms and addiction: the same reasons people refuse to quit smoking cigarettes in spite of evidence it will harm them.

> my PC always comes back to the login screen immediately after I manually use "sleep" from the power menu.

> My Mac Mini M4 is on its way.

Hate to tell you, but my Mac does the same stupid thing. I have to physically yank the HDMI cable.

> an f35 takes them out from 300 miles away.

Ah yes, and if I recall, that is how the US won in Vietnam ... oh wait. Your comment is a perfect example of the very problem I described.

You can also put a bumper sticker on your car decrying world events and this would have about as much effect as your suggestions.

> Why do I have to complete a CAPTCHA?

> Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property.

> What can I do to prevent this in the future?

> If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware.

Love how actual captcha spyware has turned to victim-blaming to justify its existence.

It was effectively neutered in almost all juristictions, mostly with "assault" weapon bans.

Literally cannot. The asymmetry of technology which we have allowed to grow and flourish makes it infeasible. Flock and other manifestations of this beast sends shivers down spines and prevents any serious resistance.

> AI can do a lot of their job must not have been doing important work in the first place

Not really. My doctor suggested using an AI-note taking "app" during our visit. I politely declined, believing it would diminish his attention and reasoning abilities (saying nothing of the privacy evisceration). The doctor is doing important work and using AI would lead to unwanted consequences. Sadly, this maxim is applicable to almost all skills and trades today, in espite of the nauseating AI evangelism extoling false virtues.

"Ad" is a euphamism for behavioral management - the goal and the pièce de résistance for any successful enterprise. Always has been this way, always will remain this way. Only thing that is changing is how easy we're making it for them.

So the work is important and I am the fool because ... you think so? That is not a very intellectually-defensible position to hold. One could even reason the argument is so flawed because LLMs degrade thinking capacity.