Delemono
For emergencies there are proper laws.
And no your taco bell getting cold is not a good reason
This is probably good enough for 99% of things out there running stuff.
For everything else you have architects which will do the right thing for you.
Luxemburg is not some random backwards country
Or they reduce from unlimited to 100, 80 and 60 in no time.
It's not a big issue but because I don't care for a hard limit it's for me a better deal
I drive to go from a to b and not to race.
I care more about not getting a fine than traveling as fast as possible
Not joking just another angle: I worked on that actively.
Every new human has to learn aaaaalll of this over again.
That's also why empires like the Roman was able to disappear.
Knowledge fades and we need actively teach over and over again.
More money to our education system!
And btw people still have no clue how computers work. This hasn't changed too much :(
You might not want to overload one instance.
And running it like you do, is a no brainer anyway
There is a significant IPC increase with every generation.
If it wouldn't be narrow neo4j wouldn't need to lay off stuff.
Your examples do not refute this
Google publishes plenty of other ml based papers.
Assuming in any way that Google might loose it's reputation because of imagine is very very far fetched.
Who do you think would pay JD to generate this data otherwise?
The customers of course.
Then the question is, what was it.
Based on how little people cared about smog and CO2 I assume it was just never that cheap and easy to do.
Humans are also able to drive with vision only. Same sentiment as Hotz from comma.ai has.
I also think that radar will be a no brainer and make it better over all (night, fog) but I'm not sure if it has to be a must.
Perhaps in 20years when you have overall very good car AI the non radar version is always behind but we are far away from this market saturation. Probably more than 20 car iterations and more.