DefaultUserHN

Your photo showing Trump had little people actually came from 8 AM in the morning, as by the upload time-stamp here:

http://imgur.com/cLiofdu

Notice the time-stamp.

The following photo show way more people: https://i.redd.it/romblz2zsxay.jpg

Here is a photo showing near back end, showing the crowds goes all the way to the back, almost comparable to Obama's.

https://i.reddituploads.com/a3495b511eed42509c6f3a82b853996f...

>who'd be against basic reading, writing and arithmetic?

No one's against it. In fact, we can do better than Common Core. We can do better than just the basics.

>You mean the Affordable Care Act, the one that, once repealed, will put dozens of Americans I know into serious mortal peril?

But if not repeal, will leave me homeless, since I won't be able to pay the mortgage bill anymore.

Why do your friends get priority over me? Why do I have to lose my house so your friends can have health care? What about me? What about all those other people, left behind by Obama's presidency?

Well, we at least know what they did. They voted for Trump.

>...he was going to give things back to the people and what exactly he was giving back?

Jobs. Money back from ObamaCare premiums. Lower taxes for small businesses. Voice heard. Concerns for security heard.

>I really don't understand how [people] could possibly not see through all that smoke.

But they did see through all the smoke that CNN was blowing, and that's why they voted for Trump.

Maybe it's you who can not see through the smoke that CNN is blowing?...

When the world doesn't make sense, is the whole world wrong? Or maybe you are wrong?...

>Regardless, we have surveys showing the opinions of non-voters and Trump, at least a couple weeks ago, was at record levels of unpopularity among Presidents-elect.

They should have voted then. They didn't vote, and when the guy they don't like get voted into office, they get all angry. Well, they should have voted.

>...elected officials are compelled to and do respect the opinions of voters.

Trump does. He's going to implement his policies, since the voters have voted him to do so.

>They even released the video to prove it.

Very misleading video. That video doesn't show the whole day.

Here is a picture showing the crowds later in the day.

https://i.redd.it/romblz2zsxay.jpg

That video only show earlier in the day, before people started filling it up, as indicated by the time-stamp here...

http://i.imgur.com/cLiofdu.png

Here's a photo closer to the end, showing the crowds goes all the way to the back, almost comparable to Obama's.

https://i.reddituploads.com/a3495b511eed42509c6f3a82b853996f...

>Fox News has been doing the fake/biased news thing for a long time...

It's ironic that Fox news was so biased before. But this election, Fox News did good. Fox was the only news media that actually show both sides of the story, while the rest of the news media were overwhelmingly biased against Trump.

>You can watch a timelapse of the whole inauguration.

Very misleading video. That video doesn't show the whole day.

Here is a picture showing the crowds later in the day.

https://i.redd.it/romblz2zsxay.jpg

That video only show earlier in the day, before people started filling it up, as indicated by the time-stamp here...

http://i.imgur.com/cLiofdu.png

Here's a photo closer to the end, showing the crowds goes all the way to the back, almost comparable to Obama's.

https://i.reddituploads.com/a3495b511eed42509c6f3a82b853996f...

>What has he promised...

Repeal ObamaCare.

>...and how could it work?

I no longer have to pay $1,000 monthly premium for a health care package I can't even use.

>So if your child isn't as promising as others, oh well, they'll get to go to a "lesser" school.

Get rid of Common Core. Force schools to compete. Now, every schools will have to teach their students better.

Trump hates PC language. Trump is not about to let corrupt politicians redefine mundane things as "National Security".

Who knows if you'll be right or everyone else will be right. We'll have to wait 4 years and see if Trump comes through with his promises.

Right now, you're acting like you're the only that is right and everyone is too stupid. You're acting very smug, the same smug that lost Hillary the election.

>...he has been so slippery on many issues and... stand for and against something at the same time.

Because ObamaCare is not 100 percent all bad or 100 percent all good.

Trump, like everyone, is allow to like the good part of ObamaCare and hate the bad part of it.

>He just stood up in front of the CIA and claimed that he had more people than any Inauguration.

Except he didn't. I watched that press conference. He said he had lots and lots of people. He never said he had more people than Obama. He was calling out CNN because CNN was trying to make it seem like had less than half.

>In reality, he had less than half.

Except we have photos showing he have almost the same as Obama. Around 90% of Obama.

https://i.redd.it/romblz2zsxay.jpg

https://i.redd.it/gvwobqfr0yay.jpg

The photo you saw probably came from CNN. CNN posted a photo from earlier in the day, before people started filling it up, and claimed that Trump only had half the people.

http://i.imgur.com/cLiofdu.png

Here's a photo closer to the end, showing the crowds goes all the way to the back, almost comparable to Obama.

https://i.reddituploads.com/a3495b511eed42509c6f3a82b853996f...

Here, some more info, this time, by CBS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5AxV1SrTkE

What I meant was they should have fought to oppose it. Then we wouldn't have this wasteful situation in the first place.

Wells, that's once of the risks that hospitals should have thought about when they adopted the ACA.

On the other hand, consumers are rejoiced.

Except Trump is going to repeal all of Obama's Executive Orders.

She wants her say, but she doesn't want Trump to have his say.

Don't allow politician to communicate directly with the people? I don't think that's such a good idea.

They insult Trump, and when Trump insult them back, they get angry.

When will they learn: Don't insult Trump and Trump won't insult back. It's that simple. If you're going to dish it out, you better be ready to receive it too.

Lewis has the right to criticize Trump.

And Trump has the right to criticize Lewis back.

People who are trying to censor Trump are acting like Fascists.

>Trump speech has uncanny echo of Batman villain...

For you.

You literally link to a CNN article that used the same misleading photo from the Vox article.

I already give you links for photos showing Obama have the same amount of people at the time of his speech as Trump have at the time of his speech.

Seriously Vox? Here's a photo:

https://i.redd.it/romblz2zsxay.jpg

And another one, from a different angle:

https://i.redd.it/gvwobqfr0yay.jpg

Can't believe Vox would publish fake news (intentionally misleading news) like this.

EDIT: Vox photo came at an earlier time, before people started filling it up. Looks like Vox shopped a fake time-stamp onto it too.

http://i.imgur.com/cLiofdu.png

Here is another photo, from someone closer to the end. You can see that the crowd goes all the way back.

https://i.reddituploads.com/a3495b511eed42509c6f3a82b853996f...

This situation would never happen though. As soon as Replicators are created, the rich will take full control of the Replicators, and the poor will never be allowed to have them. And with the Replicators, the rich will, again, rule the poor.

The biggest problem with Nate Silver was that he was a victim of fake news. He got caught up in the fake news, believing that Trump have no chance.

Anybody who actually went to a Trump rally would see with their own eyes, that what Trump said was totally different from what the TVs claimed he said. They could see that the whole media was lying about Trump.

If Nate Silver had went to just one Trump rally, he would have seen that too, and he would have known that Trump was going to win. Would have been able to tweak his data set, and would have made a better prediction.

Huffington Post is not a credible news source.

Eventually, you lean to stop listening to the so called "experts" and start doing your own research. Get the facts straight from 1st hand sources like John Podesta's own leaked e-mails, instead of listening to 2nd hand sources like CNN.

Depends.

If you want to woo her, you can pay for her meal. But if you're ugly, she will think she is not the right girl for you.

If you want to be nice, you can pay for her meal. But again, if you're ugly, she will think she is not the right girl for you.

If you're ugly, and you decide not to pay for her meal, you just confirm you're a loser in her mind.

However, if you're ugly, and you pay, she'll think you're a nice guy, but she will also think she is not the right girl for you.

If you're a guy, and you're way hotter than the her, she'll usually offer to pay. And if she offers to pay for you, and you have to let her pay, otherwise, she'll be disappointed in you. Let her pay, and she'll be all giddy and happy.

Now, if you're about the same level of attraction as her, you both can just pay for your own meals.

And, if you're a normal looking billionaire, you're probably gonna have to pay for her meal, because she'll be expecting it.

However, if you're an ugly billionaire, you're probably gonna have to pay for her time and... her body too.

On the other hand, if you're a hot billionaire, shit, you don't have to pay for anything. Girls will throw themselves at you.