News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

Daddy_cat

Re:The Dangerous Academic Is an Extinct Species on Thursday April 13, 2017 @10:01PM (#14112238)
Me too. College turned me into a men's rights activist
Re:Americans Are Skeptical That Hard Work Will Pay Off on Monday April 10, 2017 @11:55PM (#14084727)
I was making fun of the douchebag parent comment. Agreed
Re:Americans Are Skeptical That Hard Work Will Pay Off on Monday April 10, 2017 @10:34AM (#14078785)
I agree. Poor people are poor because they are lazy, if you really think about it.
Re:Airbnb Bans Host Who Dumped Guest Because She's Asian on Friday April 07, 2017 @07:55AM (#14058910)
Inb4 the top minds of hacker news play devil's advocate
> as this order isn't targeted at "Muslim immigrants"

Not sure whether you're acting naive to prove a point, but the countries represented aren't majority Muslim by accident - they were picked for a specific reason. Not to mention, Trump himself alluded to a "Muslim Ban" with a similar structure before, as did multiple aides. He's run on a platform of xenophobia. It's not a stretch whatsoever to make that point - everyone understands why the poster is labelling it that way.

The implication that the person that posted is injecting ideology into that comment is ironic, since willfully choosing to ignore the political context of the ban is just as bad.

> the categories "Muslim immigrants" and "natives" both contain substructure

Yes, all language does.

>not taking a side on whether the order is a good or bad idea

You're taking a side by turning a blind eye to the ideological ramifications and context of the ban. "I'm just playing devil's advocate" is always problematic because it purports that injecting something dangerous like this into the conversation "doesn't count".

The employee worked over 75 hours a week, but routinely had his timesheets rewritten to show 40. When he complained, he had some of his works taken away. When he was seriously injured in his job, his injury was laughed off as a lie and he was sent back to work anyway. I think it's fair to say that this person has a unique set of extremely challenging circumstances different than what you described. I'm not sure what we have to gain by dismissing these henious labor violations. Even if it was just as bad for you (I doubt it), would that invalidate this person's experience, or mean we shouldn't investigate these crimes?
Re:Pause, We Can Go Back on Sunday February 05, 2017 @09:49AM (#13572597)
More tedious nostalgia for the glorious "time before phones",this time with vinyl as a pretentious garnish. Can we please stop thinking this idea is new or interesting?