CyberTrekker

The plot is always an important part of any show.

Ditto

Fingerprints are not hard to obtain at all. As a matter of fact, fingerprints are easy to obtain.

You are correct, it's not a perfect system or perfect solution. No security system is perfect.

Not only is that addage showing its age, even though it's as applicable now as it was from its point of first usage, but I would suggest it's a disgrace that humans both think and act in such a manner. In other words, just because it's free shouldn't mean the user should be the product.

I realize a lot of people will not agree with me, however I tend to think way beyond the general human conception and as a consequence hold to a very different perspective.

Aside from the general points in other comments as well as the article itself, I would contend that even modern philosophers are ignorant of real and abiding philosophy.

The contemporary conception and definition of philosophy, of what it is about and its methodology, is directly related to the misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the approach adopted by some of the well-known ancient Greek philosophers from their public works. From this error of conception and approach, over time a solely intellectual approach has been developed by the modern pseudo-philosophers with their equally pseudo-philosophy. Academia has never truly understood the real nature of philosophy.

As for science, well a similar paradigm exists for it in its proclivity to be defined and developed around a partial representation of what it means and should be, from the point of human concepts and its bias. In other words, it's been defined entirely from one philosophical perspective of life and its methodology oriented around that restrictive perspective. This is the reason that, until science itself learns to extend their perspective and conceptual viewpoint, it will never arrive at real causes or origins but rest on mere effects.

As it would to varying degrees with any system, knowing humans.

I realize that to some it may appear as obvious, but quite often the obvious is overlooked as people respond to the hastily promoted propaganda relative to a system and become emotionally entangled in it instead of holding to reason.

Having prefaced my response with the above clarification, such an outcome should be expected rather than being unexpected. There's no such thing as a totally secure and uncompromisable system. Any system can be compromised. Where there's a system, there's a way to compromise it.

When all is said and done, what can reasonably be expected is a system that's as secure as it can be reasonably made and a genuine effort to patch vulnerabilities as quickly as humanly possible.

Every conceptual viewpoint reflects a particular world view, whether an officially accepted world view or an alternative world view. To rest an objection or finding a fault on the basis of a generalized statement like you made anent "world view" is actually proof of nothing and possesses little meaning of any consequence - other than, of course, that we reflect an individual or a collective world view.

As for the origin and global point of emergence of the human species, this could be debated ad nauseam. I would contend that no current view would be entirely correct.