Centreal

We have a serious problem for research and development at scale is at hostage of centralized publishers.

Gitchain (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7758608) is the first and only proof system that can establish reliable intellectual property management and history logs.

Literacy reading and writing through Github, Authorea, Penflip, Gitbook all share the same liability without clear federation.

Creative and alternative ways of realizing empathy for emotional-intelligence state security issues are at will of our ability to trust network.

That is more an issue of unflagging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Trust_network than worrying about who is the alpha agent. We can count fine against secret traumatic wars if we each log action, community action (with secure, stable, distributed tools like http://www.matrix.org/alpha and https://www.getaether.net), and begin to self-determine our social systems and safety issues.

Maybe that need is why change (log) currency is so important. With headligns we say yes or no rules, there is forced error between terms.

Where really terming needs worthy space (safe) to audit psychotechnological/narrative trails, we fight judging betters as-if technology today has limited memory.

A. https://archive.today/memdu (see History, judge yourself)

Confusing pattern recognition is a fast pain. Slowing social scaling sense to account for trauma/error combinators is about literacy.

Could you tag, track, or predict a (safe and secure?) time and space to leave food instead of their identity?

Microempathic targeting of food pain points could be a healthily decentralizable dApp for Bitnation?

Shared/public/open source warning lists are distributed intelligence, letting end-users pick their own feed.

Pain-axis is enormously difficult/distressing to codify.

Stopping still has barely survived as logic and fact worth recording — as actionable emotional-intelligence.

Have you talked with Aether (http://www.getaether.net) / Burak Nehbit, about decentralization, proof-of-work, and end-to-end encryption?

Matrix's social tools might parallel well together.

Link missing because still waiting to start?

A distinguishing use case for open source intelligence is being able to counter lossy consciousness factors with open source counterintelligence.

Readily able to read and write due diligence are literate, educated, emotionally-intelligent populations who can be a part of (the granular war to determine) distinguishing records.

That distinguishment is essential. Being able to offer distributed, decentralized, and open source intelligence is what we are waiting for maturity.

Well their focus to find intelligence is credible if you need a war. If their focus is to find emotional intelligence, which means sense and logic together, their apathy may still objectify objectives.