Byzantine
Re:Race and Attraction, 2009 – 2014
on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:53PM (#8300793)
The problem with today's liberal attitudes is that such attitudes wrongheadedly assume that racism = violence, when in reality, racism usually just means separatism, which if anything, decreases violence, as good fences make good neighbors.
Re:Race and Attraction, 2009 – 2014
on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:50PM (#8300789)
So basically, you accept just about anybody, because you have either low standards or just want to be with as many woman as you can.
Not exactly classy, bro.
Re:Race and Attraction, 2009 – 2014
on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:49PM (#8300784)
Extreme height can also be severely limiting to a man such as yourself, so just look for a 6 foot tall White woman.
Re:Race and Attraction, 2009 – 2014
on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:46PM (#8300776)
>"Race" is a proxy for social class.
You mean, "social class" is a politically correct term used to explain the general differences between races.
Asian men tend to do very well in school and careers and typically have a higher than average income, yet they are considered less attractive than Latinos, who generally perform much lower in school, career, and have a lower income than Asian people.
Re:Race and Attraction, 2009 – 2014
on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:41PM (#8300760)
So basically, this data confirms what everybody sees in reality: that white people are considered the most beautiful by every other race; even to the point that adding "whiteness" to your racial profile will increase interest in your overall profile. That's why in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia; the most successful, attractive people shown in the media have White features or are very light skinned.
Now, here's a better question about this data: would this study be considered "racist" if Black or Asian people were considered the most attractive?
I'm guessing no. "Anti-racism" is just another way to say "anti-white".
Re:The Anti-Facebook
on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @04:04AM (#8196371)
Assuming those people are actual, proven, and unanimously agreed upon sex offenders, such as a 50 year old man who did time for making 10 year year old boys perform fellatio on him, I don't see what is wrong with making them pariahs. If anything, they should have been executed rather than reintroduced into society.
Re:Tox: A simple, distributed, free, secure Skype replacement. Now alp...
on Friday August 01, 2014 @09:44PM (#8123715)
But you don't have to actually know them. If they posted their Tox ID on 4chan, which happens all the time, and they accept my friend request, I would have their IP address, correct?
Re:Tox: A simple, distributed, free, secure Skype replacement. Now alp...
on Friday August 01, 2014 @09:16PM (#8123668)
What makes the main developer, irungentoo, qualified to write the Tox core?
Re:Tox: A simple, distributed, free, secure Skype replacement. Now alp...
on Friday August 01, 2014 @09:11PM (#8123661)
So basically, everybody who gives out their Tox ID on 4chan is also giving out their IP address. Great.
Re:Tox: A simple, distributed, free, secure Skype replacement. Now alp...
on Friday August 01, 2014 @09:10PM (#8123658)
They intended "Talks" but most people will just associate it with toxicity or toxins. They really need to come up with a better name if they want to succeed.