Bohahahaha
Bohahahaha on Hacker News
"On the day Marianne Ny reactivated the case, the head of Sweden's military intelligence service - which has the acronym MUST -- publicly denounced WikiLeaks in an article entitled "WikiLeaks [is] a threat to our soldiers." Assange was warned that the Swedish intelligence service, SAPO, had been told by its US counterparts that US-Sweden intelligence-sharing arrangements would be "cut off" if Sweden sheltered him."
http://johnpilger.com/articles/assange-the-untold-story-of-a...
"Those doubting the degree of ruthlessness Assange can expect should remember the forcing down of the Bolivian president's plane in 2013 - wrongly believed to be carrying Edward Snowden."
If you think of Sweden as ABBA, think again:
"In December 2010, The Independent revealed that the two governments had discussed his onward extradition to the US."
"The rendition and subsequent torture of two Egyptian political refugees in 2001 was condemned by the UN Committee against Torture, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch; the complicity and duplicity of the Swedish state are documented in successful civil litigation"
http://johnpilger.com/articles/assange-the-untold-story-of-a...
What you wanted to say: "Sweden claims Ecuador starts causing ... "
You've meant to say: "Sweden said that Ecuador requested that ... while Ecuador said on it's website it didn't request this."
Love this in the Guardian article:
"Sweden’s justice ministry said it welcomed Ecuador’s acceptance of its offer of negotiations, but the Guardian understands the ministry rejected a proposal by Quito to meet this week because officials were on holiday"
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/11/julian-assange-...
Assange was now 5yrs 'imprisoned', how much would he have gotten in Sweden on the charges? (if proven guilty)
This chlorine everywhere in the US astonishes me. When visiting I'm not able to drink (non bottled) Coke b/c of the bad and intense chlorine taste.
Most people here think this article is about Assange being guilty or not. It's not.
If I went to my professor at university complaining that I waited 5 years and then could not solve the challenges b/c of not enough time left, he would just laugh at my assumption that I'm not responsible for the fu
What everyone with that point of view means is this: the prosecutor has had 5 years to fix a potential complex setup but waited for the very last minute.
A 'comparison' to the US can't prove that Swedens system is not fu but only that the US might be even more so.
Well waiting 5 years and then switching to strategy B (interview in London) 1-2 months before the last possible moment was obviously not the best strategy for the (potential) victims.
I'd rather say, 80s hackers are todays yuppies. So it might be the same people.