BanMeAndWin

Review increases German acid attacks.

Then review increases Swedish acid attacks.

Focusing on just the UK as if it was some mystically isolated scenario is intentionally skewing the statistics and the discussion to allow for demographic plausible deniability.

I'm not here to assert the correctness of my position, for the record, especially since I've already pointed out one only has to look at similar cases from Germany and Sweden. I've already placed my bets on the inevitable rise of European private prisons within the next ten years.

Member of open-minded community that values data, science, evidence, citations, and proof dismisses strongly correlated conclusion due to ideological insubordination, news at eleven.

> "There must be some allure to remaining nameless. Some might accuse anonymous artists of irresponsibility—of orphaning their work and leaving it in the hands of a ruthless public."

A ruthless public?

Creating something and letting the world run with it on their own terms isn't done because the creator thinks the faceless mob are savage dimwits. In fact, in order for anonymous art to work, the creator MUST have faith that the public will be motivated to act on a good idea, an insightful summary, a powerful display, or any other call to action that speaks specifically to the people who are tired of being cast as a "ruthless public"

The elitism about these pieces is so painfully predictable you could use it to increment cryptocurrency hash difficulty.