Accujack
Besides that, things like the number of holes in the calendar ring matter.
Check out Clickspring on youtube, he's one of the people who narrowed the hole count down to 2 numbers, and this paper argues hard for one of those.
He's building a replica of the mechanism using period tools, and it's amazingly precise so far.
As well as strongly regulating sales of data/data brokers, of course.
You don't do this to try to make money, you do it for fun, knowledge, and the occasional cool (but not very valuable) item.
There's not much value in training it to simulate a redditor, but there's a lot in modeling bad behavior.
Well, that and the API changes that drove away something like a third of the users.
Much depends on whether your systems were running BSD-style RPC services.
My pay peaked in 2001. If subsequent job moves and raises had kept up with inflation, I'd be making just under $150,000 a year today.
As it stands, the job market is so poor (and my skills need updating, to be honest) I'm having trouble getting a job that pays even $80k.
Construction is already beginning.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/12/07/lithiu...
I'm not attacking them or anything, I'm sure there are people out there who are home bound who love to get a bit of a tipple now and then for whom such a service is wonderful. It just wasn't in my family's case.
I'm regretting I didn't get more done during the pandemic, but then I was a "critical" worker and I didn't get to stay home.
It's just greed and a desire for control.
The neoconservatives who began their campaign shortly after the civil rights battles of the 1960s achieved a great deal during the Reagan presidencies.
Many of the problems with the US today can be traced back to or through those years, including the relaxation of financial laws and regulation that led to the 2008 housing crisis, the ongoing consolidation of American businesses through mergers and acquisitions, and the increasing inequality in wealth distribution.
There's no reasoning to it beyond a group of people who want to live in the world they thought they were in back in the 1950s, when god was in the pledge of allegiance and America was perceived as mostly white.
Money and political power are letting them heavily influence the US for now. Unfortunately it will probably only be correctable once they die of old age.
There's no great strategy in play. The Democrats aren't a lot better in their goals, they also want the imagined past in a different way, but they're not the ones causing the issues.
Corporations and services are once again forced to standardize on open standards for web access or lose customers because the public (and techies specifically) will not support a proprietary software model for the public internet.
It's a cycle - corporations become big and successful, try to establish proprietary control, then lose massive market share to newly created competitors.
Once successful corporations get large, they tend to forget that eventually the frog getting boiled does jump out of the pot, and is usually angry when that happens.
What's really behind the decision is simply risk avoidance. It's like "firing" bad customers. The banks consider it prudent business to kick anyone who might be a problem out the door. Avoiding one criminal causing issues is worth kicking out 20 ordinary honest customers.
Taxing Billionaires is tricky... they can manipulate data (like anyone else) to show their actual income as 0 dollars.
I'm more worried about what would happen to the money thus produced... the US government has been digging itself a large fiscal hole the last 3 years and shows no sign of stopping.
Cheap packaged food is very bad for you, and not everyone has the ability to purchase fresh stuff and cook it.
This is one excellent example of the reason that increased/renewed anti-trust actions by the FTC are necessary.
When the aircraft carrier Oriskany was sunk as an artificial reef, the environmental remediation cost was $11.89 million.
Supposedly, a University in Taiwan is working to validate the full version of the paper and the material, and the authors of the paper say that once confirmation is complete (and is successful) they will release the full version of the paper... sometime in 2024.
We'll see what happens, I guess.