7636528A

> It takes some things as axioms, for example, that only the US are interfering/meddling in the world

Where does it claim that? I'm not saying you are lying. I didn't watch it properly so I may have missed it.

> It's a bit näive to not see this as anti-government propaganda.

I don't know what that means. Are you saying that something in the video is untrue or just that it contains facts that make the US government look bad? Would you describe a similar video criticizing an enemy of the US government (whether another government, terrorist organisation, or something else) in the same way?

> Youtube's goals is not the same as the authors

I think the problem here is if YouTube's goal is to help the government who (according to the author) is Google's customer. YouTube is under no obligation to do anything to help spread the author's video, but they should definitely be criticised for working with an organisation committing horrible abuses and acts of violence.

I hope YouTube and other platforms for user content will be replaced by something decentralised eventually. I wonder if a decentralised media platform over something like bittorrent or IPFS is or will ever be technologically feasible.