345218435
it‘s the same hockey stick bull crap that gore used to make you cry.
all the models normalize the raw data into oblivion and all the models are not properly adjusted to preindustrialization fluctuation of the climate. also, the models being used have been developed to understand current data and co2-influences — not to extrapulate predictions.
global average temperature is a joke. the earth‘s climate consists of many, many little subclimates making it so that everywhere you need a different weather forecast that often doesn‘t even hold up. it‘s a system nobody can actually simulate.
the other question is how do you deal with measurement errors today — and back in the day when they used quicksilver? quicksilver deviates by at least 1 degree. have the scales been correct? was the person reading the temperature looking at the thermometer correctly?
it‘s all bullcrap based on error prone data, nicely „normalized“ and „corrected“ every year because their whishful predictions don‘t work out.
climate „scientists“ are gonna tell you they cannot explain the entire climate system, yet they give you nice animations scaring the heck out of you. and that‘s all there is: scare. you‘ll happily pay ridiculous prices for ridiculous co2 certificates and that revenue goes into private pockets.
i whish everybody would scale back and throw themselves into the topic. but everybody i talk to just shuts down and elects to follow their church.
water and co2 are the most important ingredients for life. nobody is going to die because of it. don‘t let yourselves be fooled.
disclaimer: yeah, i‘m receiving millions from the oil and coal industries. BILLIONS even!
A: save money and try to let a product die (mac mini, mbp, ipod)
B: invest to signal hope that a product is in fact not dead (mac pro, also mbp)
both approaches will eventually lead to an iphone-ipad-only apple because in case A things just fade away with the occasional life sign as to not lose too many customers.
case B, on the other hand, gives people what they were yearning for for years and keeps „professionals“ and press stimulated but at a ridiculous price point so that, b/c of low sales, the product line can finally be killed.
what better alternatives are out there?
sure, there have been issues under jobs. but those were of different quality. cook counts beens and has no balls. schiller goes on stage and says „courage“. ive has nobody measuring his and his teams ridiculous design decissions — flat it must be!
i would bet money steve would have put the iphone 6 down, notice it wobbles, pull up his eye brows and sent the team back down the design bunker telling them not to emerge until that bullcrap is fixed.
1. need to reach all screen corners with one thumb: one-handed usage 2. be flat on all sides, don‘t fucking wobble: no bulges 3. i will touch it for interaction; don‘t look at me: touch id
now, looking at what apple serially delivers, these things are not impossible for them to achieve. the question is, why do they go the other way and try to sell me phones too slim to properly house the camera.
jesus.
no, please don‘t tell me about android. that‘s a fucked up mine field altogether.
we need to remember that there is no and will never be 100% security. while not open — which is worth nothing to the average user — we get pretty close with ios given all we know.
what actually happens is, when you borrow money, they put the numbers into your account and the negative on their balance sheet. that‘s the basic process of money-creation in a fiat system. out of thin air. debt-based on top so that nobody ever gets away.
but yeah, everybody likes to believe that the amount of money in the system represents goods and services.
now, remember when everybody was wondering why they axed the 500€ bill?
then they can‘t say anything because of nda. or the gsm standard manual costs hundreds of dollars.
my tin foil hat is glowing, i‘m telling you. we already know that gsm encryption is a joke. i don‘t want to imagine what‘s going on inside all those closed-source baseband firmwares. it creeps me out.
“A team of researchers in China sent a photon from the ground to an orbiting satellite more than 300 miles above through a process known as quantum entanglement”
links from the article:
- https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608252/first-object-telep...
- https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934
imo, it’s far-fetched to call a photon an “object”.
in startups i've seen it. countless low-pay-workers (students who need money) who do useless shit all day. devops who actually do 2 jobs for one salary. ceo's feeling special drowning in certain circles or think they accomplish sth when one of those useless shithead ministers come and look around, talk lies about how they'll improve investmemt regulation.
this city is one giant tourist multi cultural smoke screen.
there's not even one club playing good music (that is, music of my taste). everywhere it's all just weird electronic or rock/pop crap mixed by dirt cheap dj's who take the word "mix" too literally.
though there are some stupid loopholes it heavily depends on the people to defend it. but meanwhile, everybody is whining, brainwashed, focussing on the 2nd amendmend. unable to see its purpose.
other shit is more important, i guess. like what the gas price is and if silicon valley is eating money.
sheep have just lost their way.