30002926
No, it would not have been better. We were concerned about whether we'd be able to visit our loved ones in the hospital, or make decisions about their critical care when they were incapacitated, or whether we'd be able to legally pass on property. We did not have equal dignity before the law, those of us whose relationships were considered illegitimate. We weren't really concerned, and still aren't concerned, with creating the most libertarian expression of legal coupling. We are still fighting to be treated like everyone else.
For same-sex couples, the legal ability to complicate their financial situation was hard won. Recall: Only 10 years ago it took an executive order by the President of the United States to prevent hospitals that receive government funding from denying a same-sex partner visitation.
Legal marriage is a cultural legitimizer that has value to some.
Side note: The writing on Goodereader.com is terrible. I wish the link were to the-ebook-reader.com, which has a better summary:
https://blog.the-ebook-reader.com/2022/01/21/kobo-software-u...
Or even Mobileread forums:
https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4191419#p...
"Clinical studies show no effects of soy protein or isoflavones on reproductive hormones in men: results of a meta-analysis"