[dead]
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by robotresearcher on Monday November 02, 2026 @09:38PM
(#50347303)
‘Predict’ still works if you think of it as ‘predict what a knowledgeable human would say in this context’.
Substitute ‘generate’ and the meaning is unchanged.
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by jdub on Monday November 02, 2026 @09:39PM
(#50347306)
The generation is done by... prediction. It is making a guess based on weights (statistical likelihood) plus a pinch of wobbliness.
It's worth reflecting on the original domain jargon for selecting the next token: completion.
Re:Astra can read and write weights to improve Qwen
by libraryofbabel on Monday November 02, 2026 @11:31PM
(#50348094)
I know how LLMs work. I understand the output projection and logits and sampling just fine. I don't think we should call what is happening prediction because it is a misleading term with a lot of baggage associated with claims that LLMs are just statistically modeling language and "guessing" tokens without any internal representation of meaning. Since your reply is very short I can't tell whether you mean it in that sense or not.
And yes, I understand "prediction" is a standard term in the field. I just think it is a bad one and we should stop using it.