[dead]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @02:49PM
(#47852823)
More like the coordinates of a home were burned to protect its occupants. It was a practical choice, not an ideological one.
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by dmbche on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:24PM
(#47850996)
If you own something you can do what you want with it including rendering it useless
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by amalcon on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @12:36PM
(#47851140)
If you own all of it, yes. If you only own most of it, the minority owners do have some rights -- just fewer than you do.
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @02:50PM
(#47852837)
Micay owns the whole project. Ownership of the project was not exchanged or divided, part of the explicit terms of the agreement were that Micay would hold the keys and ownership of the project just as they always have.
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by dmbche on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @01:50PM
(#47852060)
Sure!
[dead]
Re:Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
by HybridStatAnim8 on Tuesday April 21, 2026 @02:51PM
(#47852860)
Thats a characteristic all modern OSs and modern apps have. You need to trust the key holders, always. Some people make their own builds for this reason. Depends on tge threat model.