[dead]
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by GuardianCaveman on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:50PM
(#44751091)
You can be aligned with a group who benefits from the same position without being associated with that group or lobbying FOR that group i.e. the KKK members probably want cheaper electricity and I want cheaper electricity but that doesn't mean when I lobby for it, I'm lobbying for the KKK.
[dead]
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by tptacek on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:54PM
(#44751122)
Please stop commenting like this here. Rebut the substance of the piece or don't, but whatever weird grievance you have with its author belongs somewhere other than HN.
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by encomiast on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:50PM
(#44751092)
I'm curious how we can distinguish between someone lobbying hard for the homebuilding industry and someone lobbying hard for people who need homes?
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by delusional on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:58PM
(#44751148)
It doesn't have to be a competition. If you're having trouble deciphering which is which, their interests might just be aligned.
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by pydry on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:53PM
(#44751110)
On this thread you can tell if somebody is lobbying hard for people who need homes because they bring up realpage or public housing and get BURIED in downvotes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44750927
The only solution that will make a difference, apparently, is relieving the private sector of onerous regulations which impact their profit margins shrug.
I thought neoliberalism was going out of fashion but apparently not.
Re:The anti-abundance critique on housing is wrong
by hnuser123456 on Thursday July 31, 2025 @06:56PM
(#44751134)
And you obviously already got your big expensive house and just want number to go up...