Sources:
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/doge-staffer-out-after-soc...
>"Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool.” -@nullllptr
>“Normalize Indian hate." -@nullllptr
>"You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity." -@nullllptr
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50695593
>"Pedo guy." -Elon Musk
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/elon-musk-transgender...
>"not a girl" -Elon Musk
>[Musk's own daughter] Wilson, 20, in an exclusive interview with NBC News, responded to comments Musk made Monday about her and her transgender identity. On social media and in an interview posted online, Musk said she was “not a girl” and was figuratively “dead,” and he alleged that he had been “tricked” into authorizing trans-related medical treatment for her when she was 16.
>“I was in fourth grade. We went on this road trip that I didn’t know was actually just an advertisement for one of the cars — I don’t remember which one — and he was constantly yelling at me viciously because my voice was too high,” she said. “It was cruel.”
>“I no longer live with or wish to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form,” she said in the court filing.
>“I lost my son, essentially,” Musk said. He used Wilson’s birth name, also known as a deadname for transgender people, and said she was “dead, killed by the woke mind virus.”
>And in a post on X, Musk said Monday that Wilson was “born gay and slightly autistic” and that, at age 4, she fit certain gay stereotypes, such as loving musicals and using the exclamation “fabulous!” to describe certain clothing. Wilson told NBC News that the anecdotes aren’t true, though she said she did act stereotypically feminine in other ways as a child.
>“He doesn’t know what I was like as a child because he quite simply wasn’t there,” she wrote. “And in the little time that he was I was relentlessly harassed for my femininity and queerness.”
>“I’ve been reduced to a happy little stereotype,” she continued. “I think that says alot about how he views queer people and children in general.”
There are a hell of a lot of easily verified sources about YOU knowingly spreading false and defamatory claims, and a huge detailed and well documented dossier full of citations about your rampant unhinged obsessive vandalism on Wikipedia.
Crypto Crime Cartel: Greg Maxwell—the Bitcoin vandal
https://coingeek.com/crypto-crime-cartel-greg-maxwell-the-bi...
You're also quite well known as a Wikipedia vandal, too:
User:Gmaxwell
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis...
>(Copied from WP:AN/3RR, because there were edits that amounted to vandalism, as well as excessive reverting)
>He has reverted Template:User freedom seven times despite repeated calls to stop from multiple editors. The version he is reverting to is far different from what the creators and users intended it for. I consider these edits to be an act of vandalism.--God of War 05:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
>I'm also surprised by the length of the block, because he was engaged in vandalism, not just edit warring. I'd block him myself but I was involved in a dispute with him over an image recently. Three examples of the edits I see as vandalism: he changed a box supporting the American military to one supporting the Iraqi insurgents. [36] He inserted an image of a woman "hogtied" and gagged into a box opposing fox hunting, and changed the fox hunting link to BDSM. [37] On Template:Wikiproject Terrorism, he replaced the image of a terrorist with one of a nuclear explosion. [38] SlimVirgin (talk) 12:22, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
And your history of baselessly accusing other people of taking drugs, right after raging when somebody accused you of using drugs:
An insight into the mind of Greg Maxwell, (Nullc) one of the founders of Blockstream:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/kn25yb/comment/ghij1eo...
>It's funny because he raged when someone accused him of using drugs and in this very thread he accuses someone of using drugs.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/kn25yb/an_insight_into...
>I think they call that being hypocritical or having sensitive skin. You decide. He can dish it out but not take it himself.
>And lastly since this is the most recent event Greg Maxwell was again trying to make waves here and false claims that he was banned in r/btc and had a big out with BicoinXio about 1-2 months back leading to BitcoinXio's ban. Basically Maxwell accused r/btc of being censored which he could have proved simply by showing us a single comment posted in r/btc from his profile that wasn't showing in r/btc. He could not. BitcoinXio naturally made him a laughing stock and got mass reported by bots. However before he was banned, he sent me the private conversation from Nullc and him where Maxwell claimed automoderator was censoring him. DM me and I'll link you the conversation showing Maxwell's true colors and his accusations of him getting banned and the content which he most likely used to get BitcoinXio banned. It's actually quite hilarious to see Nullc acting so calm in public and then going irate with his false accusations and BitcoinXio making him look like the joke he is.
On Greg Maxwell, co founder of Blockstream, and the man who helped cripple Bitcoin:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/e9gw8k/on_greg_maxwell...
>I'm talking about the Greg who using his very own guilty by association logic, that Greg Maxwell and Adam Back were associated and therefore guilty of being involved with the Bitfinex hacking.
Reddit Bitcoin Mods and Gregory Maxwell Accused of False Flag Bot Attack and Hacking:
https://www.trustnodes.com/2017/11/22/reddit-bitcoin-mods-gr...
>"We have a surprisingly large amount of evidence indicating that 4n4n4 is [Gregory Maxwell], the CTO of Blockstream."
Falsely accuse me of whatever you like, because you've already thoroughly discredited yourself with your own decades-long well-documented track record of false words and unethical deeds, knowingly spreading lies and defamatory claims.
There are SO MANY other sources I could link to showing you repeatedly beclowning yourself, regularly and obsessively and emotionally unhinged, spreading false and defamatory claims, being intimately involved as CTO of an infamous crypto scam company that helped launder Epstein's money, and other charming stuff like that, but these are enough sources for now. Only since you DEMANDED sources from me.
Cruelty is the point.
Chaos is the point.
Stupidity is the point.
Lies are the point.
Racism/anti-“different” (including different ideas) is the point.
Impunity is the point.
Destruction is the point.
What they have in common are in-our-face demonstrations of centralizing power, designed to encourage their base vicariously while stealing their lunch.
And discourage, silence, excommunicate, dis-home and dis-connect any competent detractors in any branch of government or appropriately hard news.
They know the value of cutting the cost of everything, with no concept of the loss of value sans anything.
It isn’t at all difficult to recognize. It shouldn’t be hard to understand either. It is a very effective way to centralize power by replacing institutions with pawns.
Nor is the chaos being inflicted on those same institutions by targeted and random decrees. That many are vague and unbalancing is intentional. The aim isn’t to improve them, right-size them, or accomplish any national mission, etc. That would be a disaster if that was his goal. It is to kill any resistance to Trump in a way the constitution really has no effective response for.
As his power centralizes he will use his increased power to go after the next level of “threats” to his unmitigated power.
Where this stops, isn’t predictable. But given the chance, he won’t stop.
Regardless of your politics, it is an interesting historical moment, and worth seeing clearly. Trump is largely competently centralizing power to a degree we have not seen since Washington was given the greenfield mandate in which to oversee the raising up of our Constitutional institutions. An ironic difference from now.
If you want to understand the challenges and means of accruing power (with non-partisan, non-current-event nuance, and as it applies in any form of government), I recommend:
The Dictator's Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics [0]
It says “Dictator’s” but the book covers every type of government and the principles and resulting plays apply to all.
And there is always Machiavelli.