Twitter's own legal team has categorically said that the "Twitter Files" show no such thing. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/06/tech/twitter-files-lawyer...

The COVID vaccine reduce transmission, as demonstrated by the analysis of infections in prisons.

COVID causes far more heart complications than the COVID.

COVID totally has caracteristic found in nature; see SARS epidemic in 2003, or MERS.

do you even know what you linked? That article is about if the actions amounted to

“ amounted to government coercion to censor content or, worse, that Twitter had become an actual arm of the US government.”

More so this is filed in their defense in a lawsuit. Hardly proves anything

There are studies (Boston I recall) showing medical workers got infected more frequently the more shots they had.

I haven’t seen a single study that shows covid caused any heart complications at all. Just drivel on social media. We know for sure the mRNA shots cause various forms of heart problems.

Covid having some characteristics found in nature and some not found in any other coronavirus in nature does not prove your point.

> The twitter files gave proof governments have been using social media to censor legal speech paid for by the tax payer.

Source?

Are you looking for cnn, msnbc, fox, or one of the other media corporations fueled by pharma alone to write an editorial telling you why something is true?

Go read the damn twitter files. That is the source.

Are you questioning the veracity of the data given in the twitter files? Because even the executive branch didn’t do that.

> Are you looking for cnn, msnbc, fox, or one of the other media corporations fueled by pharma alone to write an editorial telling you why something is true?

I am looking for specific evidence that substantiates the claim that was made. "Go read the damn Twitter files" is not evidence anymore than "Google it".

> Are you questioning the veracity of the data given in the twitter files? Because even the executive branch didn’t do that.

This means nothing to me, because you have not provided any supporting evidence for your claims.

I’m not here to feed you sources or convince you. If you’ve ignored the twitter files for months no link from me is going to change your mind.

Have a nice day.

I've read the Twitter files. I do not believe the content supports your claims.

The fact that you refuse to link to any specific evidence makes it seem like you know this and aren't acting in good faith.

The Twitter files were a conspiracist field day. Very easy for people to take random quotes or figures out of context and use them to support their preconceived notions. It's amazing how many people are handwaving "look in the Twitter files" as proof of their claim that has no evidence otherwise, or has even been long since disproven. It's not surprising at all to see the same polemicists and grifters tout the same line every time something happens that can be spun to "prove" their point.

Is handwaving one of the new buzzwords in the propaganda shops. I see a lot of dismissive comments lazily using this lingo.

The sky is blue

Exercise is good for you

The government has assigned an agent to follow you when you leave your home, and listens to you through your cellular telephone

Excess refined sugars is bad for you

Isn't this an interesting argument structure?

When filled with facts sure.

They're all facts - just try debunking any of them