News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by pixl97 on Thursday November 03, 2022 @02:12PM (#33455040)
Unless you generate more than $10 from the account. For example in presidential election years in the US billions is spent in advertising the elections. A few PACs would gladly throw cash at astroturf movements on social media even at the risk of being banned.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by pessimizer on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:45PM (#33456406)
Sounds good to me. That would mean that your energy in moderation would directly result in income. If superpacs are willing to pay $3.33 a message, that's a money-spinner.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by etchalon on Thursday November 03, 2022 @02:20PM (#33455157)
You solved bots, but destroyed the product.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by trynewideas on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:22PM (#33456042)
I mean, who here remembers app.net? Love the Garry Tan endorsement! https://web.archive.org/web/20120903182620/https://join.app....

EDIT: Lol Dalton's PART of YC now. Hey dude, why not pitch it then

Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by lancesells on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:29PM (#33456171)
I don't even know if it solved bots. Rich countries, rich organizations, rich people could do a lot. $100M would buy you 10M bots.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by cvwright on Thursday November 03, 2022 @04:45PM (#33457242)
I think the idea is that it shifts the incentives. Sure, a rich nation state could buy tons of bot accounts at $10 a pop. But is that still the most rational path to their goal? Probably not, because there are lots of other things you can do for $100M.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by DeanWormer on Thursday November 03, 2022 @02:56PM (#33455687)
This was the strategy at the SomethingAwful forums. They seemed pretty well moderated, but definitely never hit the scale of Reddit or Twitter.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by v64 on Thursday November 03, 2022 @05:02PM (#33457491)
Having posted there in its heyday, it made for an interesting self-moderation dynamic for sure. Before I posted something totally offbase that I knew I'd be punished for, I had to think "is saying this stupid shit really worth $10 to me?". Many times that was enough to get me to pause (but sometimes you also can't help yourself and it's well worth the price).
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by dwater on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:01PM (#33455756)
This is how the SomethingAwful forums operated when they started charging for accounts. Unfortunately it probably wouldn't be useful as a test case because it was/is, at it's core, a shitposting site.
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by rsync on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:29PM (#33456163)
I think metafilter still does this ?
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by nebqr on Thursday November 03, 2022 @05:36PM (#33458051)
And twitter isn't?
Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by pfortuny on Thursday November 03, 2022 @03:49PM (#33456485)
The problem is the meaning of those rules. Any rule looks reasonable when it is written down. And after some time it becomes a weapon.

For instance, the three deletions (forget the exact term) rule in wikipedia. It is now a tool used by “the first to write”…

Re:Ex-Reddit CEO on Twitter moderation by pclmulqdq on Thursday November 03, 2022 @04:52PM (#33457347)
This kind of thing worked for a few forums that tried it before FB/Twitter came around.