News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by klyrs on Saturday October 29, 2022 @08:54PM (#33389710)
Why do you keep posting that? I count 3 copies of the same comment. You're confused, please re-read the thread and note the difference between TSLA and TWTR.

edit: in retrospect, I see that you're a new user. FYI: I've flagged this comment, but not the original, because you're spamming. Spam isn't cool.

Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by warbler73 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @09:51PM (#33390138)
I'm not spamming I'm pointing out that TWTR is now private in response to insinuations and assertions it is not.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by VintageCool on Saturday October 29, 2022 @08:51PM (#33389674)
But that's TWTR, not TSLA.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by warbler73 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @08:57PM (#33389723)
Yes that is exactly what I said.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by klyrs on Saturday October 29, 2022 @09:02PM (#33389768)
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33389159

> I'm not pissed and I am a stockholder.

Given that Tesla, not Twitter, is public, and the conversation was about Tesla stockholders, don't you think it would be better to assume that the comment above was written by a Tesla stockholder?

Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by warbler73 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @09:52PM (#33390141)
The discussion here very clearly is primarily about Twitter. Assertions it is primarily about Tesla are unequivocally disingenuous.
Re:Tesla engineers were on-site to evaluate the Twitter staf... by klyrs on Sunday October 30, 2022 @08:11PM (#33400469)
Um, no. The discussion here is about Tesla engineers at Twitter. Your commitment to your misreading of the situation, despite numerous indicators that you're mistaken, is perplexing. Good luck.