The reality of the situation is that many artists are not releasing digital versions on sites that provide lossless downloads (like bandcamp or beatport). So if you want the highest quality you can get, you're either subscribing to Tidal/Deezer/Apple Music (where you don't own the music) or you're buying a CD.
I couldn't find a definition of "CD quality" or "Hi-Res 48K" on the FAQ so don't know exactly what I would be getting. But as you can see, buying on CD is still about the same price as downloading files yet the artist usually still makes more for CD sales (from my understanding). That doesn't count the fact that I sometimes buy used CDs for much cheaper and the fact that I get to read the album credits.
I still think buying a physical CD and ripping it is a better deal if I want to control my music and don't want it to disappear from a streaming service with no warning.
I'm disappointed that this option will be going away because when it goes away, the cost of buying downloaded files will go up even more.
bandcamp is a good option for the artists that use it.
I'm still not sure where I stuffed my ThinkPad X301, the only machine in the house with a (working (the last time I tried (3 years ago))) DVD.
CD-ROMs last a long time, unlike magnetic media, SSDs, and CD-Rs. If I buy a CD-ROM, I know it’s going to outlive me. I often listen to artists who disappear—along with their libraries. Some produce actual CD-ROMs before disappearing, though that seems like a poor investment for an indie band.
I carefully back up my music, but nothing I can make is as durable as a CD-ROM. Cloud backups are great, and I have plenty of local copies, but that CD-ROM beats them all as long as my house doesn’t burn down. It’s not going anywhere.
You might consider M-Discs, which are optical discs as large as 100 GB (BDXL) that you can burn yourself, and which should have the same longevity as a CD-ROM.
Of course, if CDs are working for you, this may not be a problem that needs to be solved. ;)
It's not clear to me that there's anything special about the BDR M-Discs vs. other BDR discs.
It looked like original DVD M-Discs have been discontinued, last time I checked. IIRC, those where the things that all the articles about M-Disc longevity were written about.
(In particular, I think there was an article on HN a few weeks ago that did tests with both M-Disc BluRays and another brand. The M-Disc wasn't magic but it was a decisive winner.)
That's interesting. However I still have a couple questions:
1. My understanding there are significant brand-to-brand quality differences with optical disks. A better comparison might be Verbatim regular BDR vs. Verbatim M-DISC BDR than TDK regular BDR vs. M-DISC.
2. That article is from 2016, and I wonder if it holds up. From what I've read about optical disks, even were the disc was manufactured can be significant within the same brand. IIRC, back then they might have been making them in Japan, and I don't think they do that anymore.
Not necessarily true: they do degrade over time. DVDs are even worse, so I imagine (without evidence) that Blu-Ray discs are even more sensitive.
Really, you want to move your physical media to lossless digital as soon as you get it, and store it in a format that is both backed up and resilient to bit flips.
CD-ROMs have physical pits etched into the plastic, as do mass-produced DVDs and BDs. These advantages don’t apply to discs you produce yourself, however.
It can happen, but it’s rare—not so rare that I forgo backups, but rare enough that I continue to maintain an archive of actual CD-ROMs.