I purposefully left it out, but left just enough to google, because the trial itself is a political hotbed and has nothing to do with the technical/court discussion. This will degenerate off-topic quickly.

A man shot 3 BLM protestors, killing 2. Prosecution argues murder, defense argues self defense. The trial itself is proving somewhat of a Rorschach test for political internet bubbles.

A 17yo who shot 3 other men (2 dead) with a very large gun, who is claiming self defense, in MN.

I'm not sure how this is somehow less accurate than any other synopsis shrug.