News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by brainfog on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @04:49PM (#27610147)
The amount of pedantry and over the top literalism in your comment gave me an aneurism.
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by tptacek on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @04:59PM (#27610280)
But it didn't really give you an aneurysm, did it???.
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by CRConrad on Thursday June 24, 2021 @02:53PM (#27622238)
It was only likely to give him an aneurysm.
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by Tenoke on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @04:47PM (#27610119)
What numerical value? He either did it or didn't. Likely is an expression on the subjective probability based on the information they have.
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by bdamm on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @05:50PM (#27610920)
What subjective probability is at play? None of us were there, or even in court. Maybe something very traumatic to Mr. McAfee happened that day. Would that inform some of his later recklessness?
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by prvc on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @05:11PM (#27610432)
What is the value of the poster's feelings about this, when we can rely on actual information instead? Appending "likely" to the statement is just a way to dress up a baseless opinion in the garb of objectivity.
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by steego on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @05:01PM (#27610301)
I believe that’s how most people in society invoke a numerically void word like the word “likely”.

Call my cynical, but time and experience has taught me that people do not back up qualifying words with the appropriate level of mathematical rigor.

It’s as if they want to express an opinion without doing the leg work or providing any citations.

Had he invested the time to calculate an estimate of likelihood, I’m willing to bet an estimate or confidence interval would have been parenthetically inserted into his remarks.

That’s what my experience tells me. YMMV

Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by BitwiseFool on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @05:32PM (#27610694)
"people do not back up qualifying words with the appropriate level of mathematical rigor."

To be fair, how in the world am I supposed to calculate such things and provide a satisfactory number?

The vast majority of my conversations and discourse don't require or benefit from giving a range or specific value to such words. Would the preceding sentence be better if I said 90%, 95%, 99.5% instead of 'vast majority'? And to be honest, most people - especially myself - aren't at all accurate with probability estimates, let alone calculations.

Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by jonathankoren on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @08:38PM (#27612473)
> To be fair, how in the world am I supposed to calculate such things and provide a satisfactory number?

I take it you're not a Bayesian. ;)

Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by X6S1x6Okd1st on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @04:46PM (#27610105)
Would you have preferred the poster express a specific probability that they hold their belief at?
Re:John McAfee found dead in Spanish jail after court approv... by anigbrowl on Wednesday June 23, 2021 @04:56PM (#27610231)
51%