What the hell are you on about? This is not about inclusiveness or tolerance. You can be an utter arsehole and be a good scientist. You even used to find good scientists voting for conservative politicians, before said politicians embraced ignorance. Now, they shake their head in despair, stuck between intolerant wokeness and complete lunacy.
> Who is worse by the way, the people who don't believe it is a problem, or the people who believe it's the biggest problem facing humanity and yet refuse to do much about it (until those other people who don't believe it's a problem start to do something about it first)?
This is a straw man. There are lots of people trying to do something about it at every level. You would not be so incensed if you did not perceive them as doing something about which you disagree.
> Unless you count fermenting genocide and regime change and wars in the middle east and north africa as "doing something about it".
You sound like you’ve spent way too much time in an echo chamber. The people pushing for better regulations to preserve the environment and limit global warming are by and large not those who were enthusiastic about pouring oil on the fire in the Middle East. Almost the opposite, in fact.
And it’s “fomenting”, not “fermenting”.