[dead]
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by ttoomm28 on Sunday March 28, 2021 @06:06PM
(#26615136)
Strange word to describe that, seems rather fair actually. Do you think UK, south African, brazilian variant are 'despicable' ?
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by KiwiJohnno on Sunday March 28, 2021 @11:40PM
(#26617479)
The thing is, the virus already had a name. He just refused to call it by its official name, because that wasn't offensive enough for him.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by learnstats2 on Monday March 29, 2021 @05:37AM
(#26619286)
I think it's substantially different.
Initial outbreaks of viruses occur geographically at random (with China having a >1/6 chance); the fact that there are significant UK, South African, and Brazilian variants has a much lower random component and a much higher deterministic component. It also illustrates where those variants are still primarily spreading.
If one of those variants become globally dominant, I doubt we will continue to name them after the location.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by shawnz on Sunday March 28, 2021 @05:58PM
(#26615073)
I agree that was in poor taste, but would you say the naming of "Zika virus", "Ebola virus", or "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome" is despicable?
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by stevegalla on Sunday March 28, 2021 @11:26PM
(#26617410)
The WHO has issued guidance in 2015 to avoid naming issues such as you described from continuing to occur.
https://www.who.int/news/item/08-05-2015-who-issues-best-pra...
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by pstuart on Sunday March 28, 2021 @11:13PM
(#26617332)
In the OP's case it was done for deflection of blame rather than trying to track where the mutations are first noted.
You might have noticed there's some stuff in the news about hate crimes against asians -- there's a direct correlation there.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by Mountain_Skies on Sunday March 28, 2021 @11:29PM
(#26617420)
You may have also noticed that one of the most active stories on HN right now is 'How U.S. media lost the trust of the public'.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by nobodyknowsyoda on Monday March 29, 2021 @04:38AM
(#26618912)
You do realize the rise in attacks on Asian Americans are not simply anecdotes from the media but shows up in the statistics and police reports?
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by camjohnson26 on Sunday March 28, 2021 @05:48PM
(#26614966)
Let’s stay on topic. The truth is that many people were reluctant to even consider the lab theory because it might look anti-Chinese at a time when Trump was blatantly attacking them and blaming them for the virus with no evidence. The point is that politics led to censorship that made it difficult to consider all possibilities.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by LudwigNagasena on Sunday March 28, 2021 @09:04PM
(#26616611)
It is sad that so many people would rather compromise their integrity rather than agree with Trump.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by aantix on Sunday March 28, 2021 @09:18PM
(#26616682)
The mere mention of the word Trump, and any sort of nuanced, pro/con conversation is lost. It becomes an emotional response. A sad state of public discourse.
Re:The WHO-China search for the origins of the coronavirus
by randomopining on Sunday March 28, 2021 @09:16PM
(#26616672)
He should’ve called it the CCP Virus. I actually like where he was going (let’s be real, China’s secrecy let it spread more widely), but another Trump fail.