For example, "Femicide" is a hot topic right now in Mexico. "10 women are murdered every day", you'll frequently see mentioned in infographics shared on Mexican Facebook over the past year. There are marches and protests against femicide.
Not to say that public attention should never focus on the ordeals of any specific group that doesn't hold the #1 prize in victimhood.
But the thing is that you will read all these headlines and start to wonder what Mexico has against its women, and that life here must be especially tough for women when it comes to staying alive. When Mexico comes up in conversation, you might start mentioning things like "oof, really hard to be woman there right now!"
Eventually, you might not realize that men are the victims of 90% of all homicides in Mexico.
It's a bit like the UN's tweet in "support" of International Men's Day. Read it. It's bitterly amusing.
Given the new definition of femicide, shouldn't the figure be that 100% of homicide victims are men?
Your comment adds nothing and misconstrues arguments for equal outcomes.
This probably reflects a general societal bias where "missing woman" is seen as inherently more tragic than "missing man".
So only agendas you support are allowed here? Who made you dictator?
> Your comment adds nothing and misconstrues arguments for equal outcomes.
The same goes for your comment. Instead of attacking someone why not add something constructive?