https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Category:China
https://wikileaks.org//spyfiles/russia/
I also found this link which gives a short overview of everything they have published:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_material_published_by_...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks#Allegations_of_Rus...
It's not illegal to tarnish and smear the diplomacy of the United States. If it's legal to release the documents, then there is certainly no requirement that documents must be release about other countries. So the only question is whether it is legal to release these specific documents. He could even be biased (which of course he is since everyone is), and that still wouldn't matter.
> If what he is doing is free and innocent, then defend your actions in court. I have no sympathy of someone who uses freedom as a shield to defend being a possible agent for other countries hostile to freedom.
He is defending himself in court right now...
Just so I understand, it's your contention that Wikileaks chooses to release nothing about Russia or China?
If, hypothetically speaking, this were demonstrated to be untrue - meaning, that Wikileaks were demonstrated to be at least as critical of, and damaging to, the interests of China and Russia - would you be prepared to change your mind about Wikileaks?
this practice of bulk releasing is tarnishing to diplomacy around the world, what’s even worse is when Wikileaks only targets the western world and its allies.
You've made this assertion twice now, and again I ask: if your assertion were demonstrated to be untrue, would you change your mind about Wikileaks?
You can’t smear someone by telling the truth about them.
I miss the time when this kind of low-analysis drivel was not on the Internet, and was relegated to family gatherings, etc. When we could still hope that as more people found forward-looking hangouts, this type of lazy ignorance would give way to intelligent discussion. Now these nationalistic propaganda ruminants eat up all the energy in the discussion (every.single.time.), and it's clear they aren't going away.
How can you expect Assange to leak documents from China and Russia? Just because he has someone on the inside in the US doesn't mean he's got dirt on every other country in the world. Whataboutism doesn't help anyone's case against Assange.
This entire extradition theater is little more than the US trying to cover up for getting caught. The fabrication of rape charges shows that there's no way he's going to get any fair trial. When he will eventually get to defend his actions in court, his fate is already sealed.
The damage wikileaks has done to the US is self-inflicted, really. It you don't want people to get mad at you for massacring an Afghan wedding, for spying on your allies and even on your own citizens, don't blame the whistle-blowers. Those things shouldn't have happened in the first place.
We should first determine if they had any comparable material about China or Russia and if this came from credible whistleblowers. Wikileaks for sure had at hand material supplied by US personnel working in the US Army and intelligence agencies. I would guess that being able to obtain material of similar value by whistleblowers of verifiable credibility from China or Russia would have been extremely hard.
Which says a lot about the difference of tolerance and freedom between USA and China and Russia by itself.
And as mentioned by several on this thread, they have, in fact, published documents about China and Russia, so that whataboutery was pointless as well.
'Diplomacy' or duplicity?
Unless you think China and Russia are free from spying and corruption.
But Judging by your cheap attempt to detract from my message youre more interested in slander than the truth. Much like Wikileaks.
If the truth is slanderous then I'm glad it stings.