That sounds a lot like editorial controls of a publisher, not a platform. That should open them up for libel. (I'm sure you know that as an American)

I think we are all familiar considering your response is the de facto standard propaganda that is posted all over social media in defense of censorship.

> and the fact that you can absolutely be "censored" on a private platform.

Yes. That's the point. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this conversation.