I beg to differ. Protests in Delhi, Bengal, and UP are clearly violent.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/hundreds-on-streets-of-old-d...
> Here's your proof: BJP, the ruling party, has been caught red-handed, like there were in 2002, https://thewire.in/communalism/murshidabad-bjp-lungi-skullca....
This is from the article you shared:
While speculation has been rife on social media on how BJP workers have been posing as anti-CAA protesters with the intention of turning the protests violent, this is the first noted case where police have taken action against someone for purportedly seeking to blame a particular community.
There has been a lot of speculation on BJP's involvement in fanning violence. But it's not clear how much truth is there to it. I hope they are held accountable for whatever wrong they have done. And victims of riots (that happened in 1984, 2002 and other years) get their deserved justice.
> The cognitive dissonance is strong.
Could you be more specific about what you're trying to say here?
Setting police stations on fire and lynching policemen is not violence?
Police brutality has reached a new low as well.
Perhaps that’s the new normal?