Oh no, a 16-year-old child with a basic understanding of climate change. This must be the work of the fucking Freemasons!

Why listen to a child, specifically, and not the scientists themselves? Unless it is another attempt to portrey kids as the symbol of purity and truth.

Are we only able to listen to one or the other?

There's nothing she can teach me about climate change over scientists.

She is literally saying that people should listen to the scientists. Like come on, you can't be serious.

But I am serious and I consider affirmative action on children child abuse.

Regular or irregular?

"I don't think adults should allow themselves to be shamed by children into making decisions"

She might be right but I am older so it doesn't matter. /s

The truth is that you don't need any exemplary understanding or expertise to understand that if 99% of the scientific population in the whole world are screaming about climate change, backed by literally decades of research, you might just accept that, instead of living in your barricaded fragile ego because children are smarter than you.

Also, support from people with deep pockets? All institutions with deep pockets lose money by reducing their emissions. That is the most illogical backwards conspiracy i've ever heard.

If what you're saying is true, isn't it crazier that no major media outlet is stating who her backers are?

Most of the times, the ones with the fundamental understanding are the most sensible. KISS principle - Keep it simple, stupid!