News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addressed VM instances. Parent comment

[dead]
Re:GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addres... by zettatron on Monday August 19, 2019 @11:31PM (#20743607)
Hilarious. How poor is the talent on the GCP team that is foremost of your grievances?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addres... by big_chungus on Monday August 19, 2019 @11:44PM (#20743657)
Uhh, that's sort of a relevant "grievance" in a thread on GCP issues.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addres... by mav3rick on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @03:09AM (#20744487)
GCP and Infra both have very smart engineers.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addres... by sieabahlpark on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @12:35AM (#20743872)
Unlike AWS which needs to be good to not go out of business.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GCP to introduce an additional charge for publicly addres... by cromwellian on Tuesday August 20, 2019 @04:12AM (#20744773)
Right, because AWS isn’t part of a $900 billion market cap retail behemoth that can weather loses and no profits.
[ Parent | on HN ]