[dead]
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by mixmastamyk on Saturday August 17, 2019 @04:42PM
(#20726219)
Impressive arrogance + ignorance, congrats.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by trilila on Saturday August 17, 2019 @04:47PM
(#20726251)
Seriously, who works on a piece of software for 10+ years? Usually within 2-3 years one has to throw away most of the code as it was written in an obscure, low adoption language, or it is just so difficult to maintain that new features can't be added. Except for SOA or mSOA where parts can be replaced at any time.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by rumanator on Saturday August 17, 2019 @06:27PM
(#20726826)
> Usually within 2-3 years one has to throw away most of the code as it was written in an obscure, low adoption language, or it is just so difficult to maintain that new features can't be added.
Just because you've been working on shit show projects that doesn't mean all projects are mismanaged like that.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by mixmastamyk on Saturday August 17, 2019 @05:16PM
(#20726452)
Please put in a bit of effort. Off the top of my head, Postgres, Office, Qt. In yesterday's Blender thread they discussed it and Maya, Autocad, 3DS Max. Web? Jquery, Drupal, Wordpress.
Billions of in-house apps, for companies > ten years old.
The link above details several more, read it.
P.S. Gnaritas, you're dead. Tried vouching, didn't work.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by crimsonalucard on Sunday August 18, 2019 @04:04PM
(#20732484)
Linux and windows.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by bcrosby95 on Saturday August 17, 2019 @10:58PM
(#20727949)
> obscure, low adoption language
Plenty of companies aren't attracted to the new shiny.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by gnaritas on Saturday August 17, 2019 @05:30PM
(#20726548)
> Usually within 2-3 years one has to throw away most of the code as it was written in an obscure, low adoption language, or it is just so difficult to maintain that new features can't be added.
So you've never worked in good code, that's all. Most of the world runs on software evolved over greater than 10 years. Everything you said is wrong, because you've been surfing trendy crap that businesses mostly ignore. Good architects don't use immature languages that might not be around in 10 years, they're smarter than that.
Re:Software architects should be involved in earliest system...
by mixmastamyk on Thursday August 22, 2019 @12:24PM
(#20769737)
gnaritas, you're "dead." Looks like it started on the "Why do you host offensive content?" thread.