[dead]
Re:Ask HN: Should Qt be considered in the place of electron?
by Memosyne on Thursday January 17, 2019 @09:27AM
(#18930957)
Most of my points above are personal opinions, so I don't know how I could be spreading misinformation. I'm describing things through my own perspective and I may or may not be categorically correct.
Maybe Qt is full of potential in your country? Perhaps Qt is booming in your industry? I haven't had those experiences. If my sentiments are misplaced, just inform me with reasonable arguments and I'll gladly change my view. Telling me that I'm just wrong doesn't help anyone.
[dead]
Re:Ask HN: Should Qt be considered in the place of electron?
by throwawaymath on Thursday January 17, 2019 @02:51PM
(#18933964)
So do you have any intention of trying to explain why that commenter is wrong, or are you just going to keep condescending them about being wrong without any substantiation? You haven't refuted a single claim made in this thread with a source, an example, documentation or even your own anecdotal experience.
Re:Ask HN: Should Qt be considered in the place of electron?
by Data_Junkie on Friday January 18, 2019 @02:05PM
(#18941918)
Takes none of those things to say the truth. I stated a fact, not that I was making a case. You are not the judge. So what your saying is I have to prove what I said was true, but he can say what he wants without challenge ? Really ?