Still better death than being dragged out of house in the middle of night to work in gulag and end up getting shot in the back of ones head.

In this nasty capitalism you can at least have hope, in soviet union there was no hope.

>In this nasty capitalism you can at least have hope, in soviet union there was no hope.

Any evidence to back either of these claims up?

Yes. Go read The Gulag Archipelago. The ignorance of those comparing Stalinist USSR to modern capitalism is astounding.

I think the ignorance is on you for not knowing the USA & allies version of Capitalism has killed far more people since WW2 than Stalin could've ever dreamed of, most of those wars unjustified and based on lies. Now add in poverty, drug addiction, preventable deaths from lack of health insurance, slave trade in Libya, refugees from wars we created, etc. This is far more destructive, but it's ok to not criticize it because you probably live cozy.

Thanks to capitalism, TOTAL numbers of people living in poverty are decreasing at an unprecedented rate. Every global measure we look at shows quality of life improvements like this, as capitalism and democracy have spread. https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty

Also, I do regard starving and enslaving constituents as much worse ethically than conquering another tribe or nation.

What people continuously insist on not understanding (both self-claimed socialists and capitalists) is that capitalism is supposed to be much better than earlier systems. This is the central argument of Marx. He claims the world is in a never-ending struggle between social classes. It's very obvious that capitalism is better than older systems because it's the product of earlier conflicts; so your argument does not mean anything to me. The idea is to make it even better.

Thanks to Capitalism, those people were put into extreme poverty in the first place. How many millions need to continue dying from poverty, war, and poor hygiene for Capitalism to get the same nonsense thrown at it? It's only $30 billion a year to end world hunger, but world capitalism won't step up to the plate, instead spending it on new military toys to bomb those people in extreme poverty. How much food is wasted on top of that?

http://www.fao.org/NEWSROOM/en/news/2008/1000853/index.html

It's not pure, unbridled capitalism, though.

Uh... I'm convinced that you both are very wrong (both you and the comment you're replying to). We approach to this problem entirely wrong. Nobody needs to be convinced that capitalism is bad or socialism is good, or that socialism kills people or whatever. This sort of ideological/political discourses that usually emphasize Great Men (like politicians who convince people best about why capitalism is good/bad) are the very center of the problem of both (1) authoritarian governments like USSR killing people (2) social injustice killing people. The real real problem is always the actual materialistic forces that drive people. I'm a software engineer because I like the job, it pays very well and lets me live comfortably. I got this job because my family was rich enough to send me to university where I studied CS. When you're talking about the inequality between me and a poor person, this is the real difference, not my ideology or a poor person's ideology. This fundamentally means that ideologies -- authoritarian or not -- like Marxism-Leninism are not an answer to the real problem, nor is talking to people about your religion, Jesus Christ or evil capitalism. The heart of the problem, as always if the material conditions in which people live, the condition of the workers.

The problem you've identified can only be addressed at the individual level, which socialism eliminates as a possibility because there is no individual, only group identity.